@qw25041985:
why such a complex name?
Any way, this is not a matter of "taking sides", rather, it is a question of whether the regulation is fair or not. And, BTW, it is not accurate to suggest that SCOM has been operating in an unregulated industry.
The question therefore is: is it fair (for example) to require the dominant player to give CCK 90 days notice of any changes in tariffs? What will CCK do with the notice? Well, they will publish it for all and sundry and invite the public to make objections and then eventually approve or disapprove the new tariffs.
This is the kind of thing you do when you are dealing with a monopoly. Not in a sector where you started out with three competitors out of whom one became dominant after five years of stiff competition.
Can you imagine CBK doing the same...after all, Equity bank controls about 50% of all bank accounts in the country.... and I am told that the number is likely to rise to about 80% in the next 12 months [after their joint venture with M-PESA comes alive this week...]
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.