What has the son of Tseikuru done or not done again!!
On Katiba his position is clear, YES, but sorry that we have very unfairly rubbished certain constituencies whose concerns are genuine and valid.
Kibaki is in record promising the church that certain panel beating of sections in the draft considered sloppy were to be effected prior to referundum.
That effort was defeated by sly politicians who did everything to ensure that no consensus building talks would take place before the matter was brought to parliment for debate and possible amendment. Remember the Naivasha retreat debacle where Hotels were booked and paid for but political shenanigans saw the noble effort abort.
The VP says he is for Yes but acknowledges that those in No have real concerns and should not be ostracised.
In constitution making you can not afford to appear headstrong and keep showing those of alternative persuasion the middle finger.
That is not the way of aspiring statesmen.
For heaveans sake when Kenyans wipe the scales off their eyes, they will realise that it is undesirable for us to appear to be at war with the church.
While some politicians are at home calling the clergy WANAFIKI, Kalonzo would rather we dealt with them more honestly.
Dunia ni msongamano..