N-Letter 14 of the alphabet
X-Letter 24 of the alphabet and also represents number 10 in roman numeral
I-Letter 9 of the alphabet and also represents number 1 in roman numeral
V-Letter 22 of the alphabet and also represents number 5 in roman numeral
M-Letter 13 of the alphabet and also represents number 1,000 in roman numeral

Keith Raniere's autobiography appears that he'd really love to have the reputations of people like William James Sidis, or be like Auguste Comte or even Nick Bostrom.

Yet these names I've mentioned haven't achieved an inch of his success. Why?

Pop science is used as a cover for meeting human nature and finding some existential purpose. It has failed, and is likely to fail over and over.

The vedas for example, was written not by humans but 'God' in an atmosphere of sacrifice. The ideology here is deficient of self sacrifice at all levels.

I think this is contemporary evidence on the futility of our ideas on atheism - see Dalai Lama being moved by money and influence for a deficient cause, and even the deficiency of our belief in human capability.