King G wrote:Am in consultancy in HRM and i dont see anything Safcom is doing wrong except for the 6 months rolling contracts.
Let them accept the employment terms and continue working or get another job and move on. Alai can also go to SC on their behalf.
Ditto!!!
The law on Contractual employment is very clear.
The rolling contracts..thats a pain...but again...not really illegal.
I guess...we should be very careful not to screem on top of our voices on the side of the employees..
Did you see anywhere the said "victims" (those laid off) have said they were infact kept on safcoms payroll, none for less than an yr, and most for longer than 1.3 yrs...
....with full salary and medical cover while the company was waiting for them to either recover or get other non headsets using positions internally?
Iam privy to that information.
Truth be told, if for any reason you are not able to meet terms of your explained and signed contract...then renegotiation or termination of contract follows.
However, you can only say may b some more gratuity on "human" and not medical or legal reason could have surficed.
The onus is on the said laid off staff to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the ENT conditions they experienced were primarily and only as a result of their employment.