Now now now, as someone openly supportive of Peter Kenneth, I am disappointed in his choice of running mate. In the eyes of many, and especially his detractors, PK's greatest liability is his relative inexperience in politics and governance. According to me, that is not true and I am willing to defend that view if tasked to do so.
Nevertheless, politics is about perception. Kenneth's choice of a total political greenhorn for a running mate is completely unrealistic. I understand the extent to which PK is determined to present an alternative face to the politics of this country, but that's no reason to ignore basic horse sense.
Ronald Osumba may very well possess all of the qualities we want in a great VP, but politically, he delivers nothing to PK. At the end of the day, this is a political contest, not an aptitude test for a job with Sony Ericsson.
Some will say it makes no difference. That PK will lose every which way you look at it. But as a young candidate with a couple more chances in the future, you don't want him losing with 50,000 votes. It's bad for him and it's bad for those who believe in his leadership. He still has my vote, but I think his choice of running mate will only reinforce the perception that he is not very serious - or realistic. When you are a presidential candidate, you don't people calling your judgement to question. And they have once before when he told them his creative team gave him "Tunawesmake".
Learn first to treat your time as you would your money, then treat your money as you do your time.