the courts will rule in favour of UMK/WSR for the sake of peace and stability of the country. if they are barred at this stage, it will not be fair to their constituency who is over 50% of Kenyans.

I find the overconfidence that the big coalitions have a bit worrying. CORD is also confident of 50% support.

To insulate myself from the so called democracy = power of many, i made sure i had nothing to do with the whole process by being kura-less. May the lucky guy win. Collectively we will bear the consequences whether you voted or not.
I will miss Kibaki.

73. (1) Authority assigned to a State officer—
(a) is a public trust to be exercised in a manner that—
.
.
(iii) brings honour to the nation and dignity to the office;

143. (1) Criminal proceedings shall not be instituted or continued
in any court against the President or a person performing the functions
of that office, during their tenure of office.

So, which is more important?
A person's presumed innocence until pronounced guilty or the highlighted lines below?

I am not seeing how being charged with crimes against humanity escapes dis-honoring the pres office, innocence or guilt not withstanding.

I would hate to be on the bench trying this case -
Consider another section that states
.
If the duo tell ICC to shove it, they break International Law, and by extension break Kenyan Law cause we are signatories, you can expect some reaction from our International masters...if they attend proceedings, that creates an administrative logjam and violates that section of the constitution.
The courts should stop playing for time and resolve this thing very very quickly.