I agree that “The government of Kenya has allowed itself to be treated as if it were not an equal sovereign State!"

@robinhood, Terroriam is somthing totally different.

What is definition of terrorism?
No one can make their own definition of terrorism, because definition does not change from day to day, from time to time, from place to place. An apple is apple in China, and it does not become an orange in America.

And a president of US or a president of Europe or Australia or any country does not change the name of terrorism or the meaning of it because of his idea. It's a definition and according to the language, it has to remain as definition.

So if you go to any English dictionary, and see what is the definition of terrorism.
Not the definition that just came 70 years ago, or 20 years ago, not the definition that the Americans or British or Australians give. Not a special definition. No. And pay attention, and after you check the definition, we are going to speak about some actions which have been done in the last 200 hundred years since this definition was made.

Terrorism: The act of protracted or spontanious inflicting, of systematic attacks, and assaults and intrusion upon individuals and places within human populaiton with the purpose of instilling fear trumour.

I want to engage you a bit historically if you want.

1. Do you remember the invasion of South America by Spanish and Portugese in 18th century?
- They slaughtered, systematically, distablised and eliminated 56,000,000 (56M) people in order to take control of that continent.
- And they are still holding that continent until today.
- How did they do it?

2. ...Coming...

Bring more,wabeberu must be ashamed!!!!

Not done yet. In the West Indies especially, it was considered to be more economic to import new slaves than to prolong the lives of those already in residence. Thus, of the 30, often 80% were dead from disease, malnutrition and simply being worked to deathwithin five years. (Read: C Columbus & the African Holcoaust by J H Clarke)
If you still question the 100 million dead figure, just do the math yourself. We startedwith 300 people. 100 left the village. 50 got on the boat. 35landed in America. 6 were alive five years later. These are my estimates based on my reading of various authors. However, no one can dispute the numbers in the almanac. Where are the missing people????? The answer is simple: they were murdered directly or indirectly at the hands of the European and Arab slavers and their African lackeys (yes, Africans were participants). My guide at Elmina castle told me that for every African captive that reached the coastfor transshipment, 12-15 people died in the wars, resultant starvation and the trek to the shore. If this is true, you can take the modestestimates of Newsweek saying 13 million left Africa, add 20% who did not survive the slave forts, the result yields about 15 million. Multiply that by 12 and you get 180 million lost.

Excerpts from here.
http://www.mobilization2-21.com/missing.htm

...let me add more, simplified version...

5. Inside Africa
We don't even want to talk about what they did inside Congo, inside Africa, what they did in South Africa, the Boers from Germany who systematically slaughtered and displaced and enslaved 39,000,000 (39M) people.
And held that position in what was known as the Apartheid. And the world, the United Nations accepted it all the way until few years.

Aprtheid became acceptable form of Governance in the world. And how did it come about?
The act of inflicting, of systematic attacks, and assaults upon individuals and places within human population with the purpose of instilling fear and tremour. What was that definition?

6. What about Australia?
Those people they think they are natives. Read the history.
From Sydney, 50 miles in any direction, you'll find a settlement of natives who are called "Aboriginal". Very nice complicated word.

They are the people who owned this land and have more right to the land of Australia than anyone else (according to provisions of God)
Not provisions of United Nations. Not provisions of those who went there and displaced them systematically and replaced them.
Now today, the Aboriginal are pitiful people.
And they blame them now, they whites say:
- "they drink blood all day",
- "they shoot drugs all day,"
- "they are ignorant, they are dirty,"
- "they are lazy, they don't want to change their condition"
- "The opportunity is there for them like everyone else, but they don't want to change."
- "And so since they don't want to change, they obviously deserve their condition."
- "They don't have to blame anyone but themselves."

This is what we are taught! How can some people who have been systematically attacked, tremortised, their dignity, ripped out of them!

My dear Wazuans, take a few moments, if you dare and study what has happened to them. And you'll cry if you have any feelings inside of you.

How many of them? 16,000,000 (16M) people displaced. What is the definition of that? And what was that definition?

7. on the way...