wazua Thu, May 7, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

5 Pages123>»
Should bank lending rates be regulated?
2012
#1 Posted : Tuesday, March 20, 2012 5:19:43 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
I think they should.
I've always wondered why banks don't put their lending rates on their websites while they have the most current forex exchange rates. Neither do they put the interest to be earned on savings or fixed depo accounts.
Why do they try to hide this info? Is it because it's not good?

I understand why it might not be a good idea but what is? The fuel regulation seems to be working.

BBI will solve it
:)
maka
#2 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:05:58 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
I agree with you @ 2012 there should be some sort of regulation when it comes to lending rates,personally I believe its unethical for a bank to charge 25% upwards for any loan while on the other hand you,l be lucky to get a measly 4% p.a on your deposits...
possunt quia posse videntur
mkeiy
#3 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:49:21 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
The banks argument that if regulated the ordinary mwananchi will miss on advances doesn't hold with me.
How does charging higher interest rate help me,or make it easier for me to repay?
Does it lower the risk/rate of default?
If its more risky lending when the CBR is high, then would it not follow that, its also riskier for depositors hence need for higher interest rate on their deposits?
With the zero-sum of the above argument, would it not be more sensible,business-wise, to keep the lending rates reasonably low, a few percentage points above CBR?
I think regulating them would be a good idea,capping the rates between 3%-5% above CBR.
muganda
#4 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:05:45 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/15/2006
Posts: 3,907
@2012, good arguments. Most would now agree pure Capitalism as a market system is flawed. Government regulation is required to protect the marketplace from manipulation, and even enhance competitive forces that nurture Capitalism.


Hence the min/max caps on interest spreads should be set, beyond which social aspects of the macroeconomy would detoriate - banks running tyrant and poverty sharply increasing.

Coincidentally, wasn't Central Bank intervention in effects of USD/KES crisis towards the same end? Our collective good was at the mercy of the banks. Too much regulation BAD; too little even WORSE.

kizee1
#5 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:10:06 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/29/2010
Posts: 679
Location: nairobi
how will regulation make credit cheaper? econ 101, what happens when you regulate any commodity? infact isnt credit regulated at the money? isnt it the cbk that controls the amount of money in the system?(albeit in a subtle manner)..infact can any of you guys give just one example of price controls that actually worked?
muganda
#6 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:44:09 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/15/2006
Posts: 3,907
@kizee1 in my opinion, the regulation is not meant to make credit cheaper but is supposed to prevent it from being outrageously expensive [limit/cap on spread] and I liken it to the in-duplum rule.

Okay I agree price controls are to be frowned upon, but not all regulation is price control.

All economies and markets are regulated to some extent. A laissez-faire state and completely free market has never existed.

mkeiy
#7 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:02:56 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/27/2012
Posts: 851
Location: Nairobi
kizee1 wrote:
how will regulation make credit cheaper? econ 101, what happens when you regulate any commodity? infact isnt credit regulated at the money? isnt it the cbk that controls the amount of money in the system?(albeit in a subtle manner)..infact can any of you guys give just one example of price controls that actually worked?


It has worked to a lesser extend with fuel. A petrol station in Westlands used to a few shillings more expensive than a petrol station on say Outering Rd before controls.

It's also used else where to curb runaway inflation on prime land. A punitive tax is charged on speculative transactions.

Credit and other commodities e.g sugar don't share the same market dynamics.
I don't see how banks can hoard loans, but sugar can be hoarded. Sugar can be sold in the black market.
Can lending be done in black market? How about redress for defaults in that "black market", if one were to be devised?
Not all commodities can be regulated effectively, but i think a cap on interest rates can work.


guru267
#8 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:20:33 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/21/2010
Posts: 6,675
Location: Nairobi
mkeiy wrote:

I don't see how banks can hoard loans,

Not all commodities can be regulated effectively, but i think a cap on interest rates can work.




@mkeiy a cap on lending rates will have a detrimental effects on the common mwananchi... imagine if the CBR was 18% and interest rates were capped at 22%..

Why would I as a bank lend to small scale farmer @ 22% and incur all the risk of default when I can simply lend to GOK through risk free treasury bonds @ 20-21%???

There will be absolutely no incentive to lend to the common man so the banks will hoard the loans to them..
Mark 12:29
Deuteronomy 4:16
the deal
#9 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:08:09 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/25/2009
Posts: 4,534
Location: Windhoek/Nairobbery
Banks with their huge spreads are sabotaging the economy...Kenyan banks enjoy one of the highest interest rate spreads in the world...regulation and innovation over the years have reduced the cost of doing business for banks I.e agency banking, respect those MP's.
maka
#10 Posted : Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:12:12 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
guru267 wrote:
mkeiy wrote:

I don't see how banks can hoard loans,

Not all commodities can be regulated effectively, but i think a cap on interest rates can work.




@mkeiy a cap on lending rates will have a detrimental effects on the common mwananchi... imagine if the CBR was 18% and interest rates were capped at 22%..

Why would I as a bank lend to small scale farmer @ 22% and incur all the risk of default when I can simply lend to GOK through risk free treasury bonds @ 20-21%???

There will be absolutely no incentive to lend to the common man so the banks will hoard the loans to them..

@guru 267...I tend to disagree,you are looking at only one side of the situation what happens when the CBR rate is between 6-8%,when government securities arent an attractive form of investment,banks will have to lend to the common man so as to boost profits,the kind of regulation we are talking about isnt retrogressive or harsh as we can put it rather one that will bring some sort of sanity in the banking industry and to the lending rates that the citizens are exposed to,25-28% is morally wrong...i also tend to think that kenyan banks should diversify so as to earn revenue from different sources that way they can afford to have lower lending rates while in the meantime maintaing or even growing their profits in the long run...
possunt quia posse videntur
5 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.