wazua Sun, Jun 14, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

122 Pages«<7273747576>»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Iganamagana
#731 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 8:13:33 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 3/27/2009
Posts: 1,437
Fullykenyan wrote:
Njung'e wrote:
Gathige wrote:
washiku wrote:
Njung'e wrote:
Wetangula's bodyguard loses his job.damn idiot!Sad


I realized his was a bad case when he pushed his senior. Amekaa na wanasiasa sana to a point he forgot theirs is a disciplined force.


Too sad. If Baba wins the officer will be made the IG for his dedication and commitment to serve the nation.


Wet is one fellow who is at loggerheads with his siblings for abandoning his brother after he was shot by thugs. That idiot former officer is on his own. Poor man!!

Boss, i also can't withstand Weta but it is not true that he abandoned his brother. As a matter of fact,he organised for his therapy in Belgium at that time, if my memory does not fail me.He even helped him get a disabled car, when the guy was ready to work again. Let us not believe easily in rumours


@Bigchick will confirm this after we are done with Pythagoras and logarithms.
kaka2za
#732 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 8:18:45 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/3/2008
Posts: 4,058
Location: Gwitu
dunkang wrote:
harrydre wrote:
How exactly did they arrive at naming the forms 34A, 34B and 34C? What's the logic behind it? Why not form 7A or 10B?


There are other forms and all relate to the Clauses in reference in the Elections Act.

Like Form 12 is a Presidential Candidate Nomination Form. Form 17 is for Gubernatorial Candidates. Form 16 is for Senatorial Candidates etc etc etc.


Actually the result declaration forms(A series) start from 34 to 39 for president to Governor positions. Form 16 was used in the past.
Truth forever on the scaffold
Wrong forever on the throne
(James Russell Rowell)
thuks
#733 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:26:50 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/8/2008
Posts: 1,575
Bigchick wrote:
Someone help me understand James Aggrey Orengo.

I had the misfortune of watching him yesterday and was perturbed at his introduction of his own report different from what the court registrar had.The allegations therein were also extremely wild.

So what was that about?
Did he expect the others not to know?
What was his end game?

To plant doubt 5m votes from 90 constituencies. The star has headlined the same today. The missing info is that some of the votes belong to NASA strongholds. Ngatia pointedly quipped " looks like most of the problems were in the coastal region"
Found the following on net after googling " do numbers lie"

"Big meaningless numbers

Description: These large numbers are meant to imply a significant trend, but do not provide any context. Therefore its meaning is of limited or no use."
I care!
masukuma
#734 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:52:33 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/4/2006
Posts: 13,823
Location: Nairobi
PLO reminded us of 3 things
1) don't start an affidavit with "we"
2) an eagle does not catch flies...de minus tycho tycho tycho
3) don't quote yourself...

well... I will quote myself - coz no one else is smile
masukuma wrote:
Court case has to be on won on lost on this tree!!



by the way - is there a claim anywhere on the error correction formula aka the "algorithm/logarithm" and it's applied usage?
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
ngapat
#735 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:00:08 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 12/11/2006
Posts: 930
“Invest in yourself. Your career is the engine of your wealth.”
Uram
#736 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:15:30 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 10/24/2013
Posts: 455
Location: Nairobi
I found the nullification of 2016 Austrian Presidential election interesting read. Here is just a summary of it;

Quote:

-Hofer (The Freedom Party) had lost out to Van der Bellen by only 30,863 votes.

-The Freedom party contested the outcome of the vote after claiming to have detected formal irregularities in 94 out of 117 constituencies, submitting a 150-page formal complaint to the constitutional court.
-Over the course of the investigation, it emerged that several counting centres had begun to process postal votes on the eve of the election rather than on the day after, as Austrian electoral law requires.

-Interviews with more than 60 witnesses revealed that officials responsible for counting votes had often paid little regard to official guidelines, starting to count without election observers present in the room. Some election observers, in turn, signed off protocols they hadn’t read.

-While the court emphasized that there was no evidence of the outcome of the election having been actively manipulated, the confirmed irregularities had affected a total of 77,926 votes that could have gone to either Hofer or Van der Bellen – enough, in theory, to change the outcome of the election.

-While nullifying the election, the constitutional court’s president said the ruling “did not turn anyone into a winner or a loser”, but elections were the “fundamental basis of our democracy” and therefore had to be “fully functional”.

-Hofer lost again to Van der Bellen by over 300,000 votes in the re-vote.
washiku
#737 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:22:09 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/9/2007
Posts: 13,095
Uram wrote:
I found the nullification of 2016 Austrian Presidential election interesting read. Here is just a summary of it;

Quote:

-Hofer (The Freedom Party) had lost out to Van der Bellen by only 30,863 votes.

-The Freedom party contested the outcome of the vote after claiming to have detected formal irregularities in 94 out of 117 constituencies, submitting a 150-page formal complaint to the constitutional court.
-Over the course of the investigation, it emerged that several counting centres had begun to process postal votes on the eve of the election rather than on the day after, as Austrian electoral law requires.

-Interviews with more than 60 witnesses revealed that officials responsible for counting votes had often paid little regard to official guidelines, starting to count without election observers present in the room. Some election observers, in turn, signed off protocols they hadn’t read.

-While the court emphasized that there was no evidence of the outcome of the election having been actively manipulated, the confirmed irregularities had affected a total of 77,926 votes that could have gone to either Hofer or Van der Bellen – enough, in theory, to change the outcome of the election.

-While nullifying the election, the constitutional court’s president said the ruling “did not turn anyone into a winner or a loser”, but elections were the “fundamental basis of our democracy” and therefore had to be “fully functional”.

-Hofer lost again to Van der Bellen by over 300,000 votes in the re-vote.

Gathige
#738 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:41:51 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/29/2011
Posts: 2,242
ngapat wrote:



Looks like fake news. I doubt Ndii would email such sensitive info in an insecure manner.

BTW do you know one of the easiest and secure communication is to draft a message, don't send it, share the password with your contact to read and then delete! That way, no trail, except in the servers of the hosts.
"Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
mobutu123
#739 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:42:49 AM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 7/8/2017
Posts: 74
Kusadikika wrote:
The young lawyer for Ekuru Aukot is really good. He is not as eloquent and flamboyant as PLO Lumumba but on issues of law his presentation was solid and very well argued. His evidence was specific, accurate and verifiable. It is the kind of argument that the CEO of IEBC can make as required reading for his staff and would help to improve how future elections are conducted.

It will be interesting to hear how Justice Lenaola votes on the decision and to also read his opinion because the young lawyer really put him on the spot. It was his decision that inferred that if the process is flawed then the results are flawed as well.

Well put.who is interested in looking at numbers from a flawed process?When Ngatia said that the problems were all over,especially in NASA strongholds, he was simply lending credence to orengo's assertions that the process was flawed.so who was bright here?
masukuma
#740 Posted : Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:44:33 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/4/2006
Posts: 13,823
Location: Nairobi
ngapat wrote:

this is silly Laughing out loudly

So who is the mole? it appears that someone is replying/writing... like really?
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
122 Pages«<7273747576>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.