Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
US Elections, Hillary or Trump?
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/28/2015 Posts: 9,562 Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
|
masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:CNN says their poll was biased towards Hillary and inaccurate. Quote:CNN/ORC's snap poll, gave Clinton the win with 62 per cent to Trump's 27. It was the biggest, and fastest, exercise conducted by an opinion polling firm. The poll of 521 registered voters who watched the debate was a sample which the network warned leaned more Democratic than the average - starting the night with Clinton ahead 26 per cent among the sample. Other polls carried out afterwards gave a different outcome - handing the title to Trump. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co....lide.html#ixzz4LTGB7DJT all polls done immediately after the race are not scientific polls - CNN themselves said that theirs was not scientific. Nope. CNN's poll was so biased that they had to warn voters before the debate poll that those in their sample, i.e. those who were to vote, were diehard democrats who had already given Hillary a 26% lead even before the debate started. CNN's is the most useless poll ever. No wonder its only them and some lone chonolist at fox who say Hillary won.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi
|
hardwood wrote:masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:CNN says their poll was biased towards Hillary and inaccurate. Quote:CNN/ORC's snap poll, gave Clinton the win with 62 per cent to Trump's 27. It was the biggest, and fastest, exercise conducted by an opinion polling firm. The poll of 521 registered voters who watched the debate was a sample which the network warned leaned more Democratic than the average - starting the night with Clinton ahead 26 per cent among the sample. Other polls carried out afterwards gave a different outcome - handing the title to Trump. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co....lide.html#ixzz4LTGB7DJT all polls done immediately after the race are not scientific polls - CNN themselves said that theirs was not scientific. CNN's poll was so biased that they had to warn voters before the debate poll that those in their sample, i.e. those who were to vote, were diehard democrats who had already given Hillary a 26% lead even before the debate started. CNN's is the most useless poll ever. No wonder its only them and some lone chonolist at fox who say Hillary won. really? did you google "who won the debate 2016"? the polls you have given are like peter kenneth polls and the CNBC one has a disclaimer Quote:Disclaimer: This is an informal poll. Results are not scientific and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of the public as a whole. the same website carries this article - the markets call Hillary the winner All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/28/2015 Posts: 9,562 Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
|
masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:CNN says their poll was biased towards Hillary and inaccurate. Quote:CNN/ORC's snap poll, gave Clinton the win with 62 per cent to Trump's 27. It was the biggest, and fastest, exercise conducted by an opinion polling firm. The poll of 521 registered voters who watched the debate was a sample which the network warned leaned more Democratic than the average - starting the night with Clinton ahead 26 per cent among the sample. Other polls carried out afterwards gave a different outcome - handing the title to Trump. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co....lide.html#ixzz4LTGB7DJT all polls done immediately after the race are not scientific polls - CNN themselves said that theirs was not scientific. CNN's poll was so biased that they had to warn voters before the debate poll that those in their sample, i.e. those who were to vote, were diehard democrats who had already given Hillary a 26% lead even before the debate started. CNN's is the most useless poll ever. No wonder its only them and some lone chonolist at fox who say Hillary won. really? did you google "who won the debate 2016"? the polls you have given are like peter kenneth polls and the CNBC one has a disclaimer Quote:Disclaimer: This is an informal poll. Results are not scientific and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of the public as a whole. the same website carries this article - the markets call Hillary the winner How the hell can you say that CNBC and Time were biased? BTW CNN polled just 500 people while the others polled about 1m voters.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi
|
hardwood wrote:masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:CNN says their poll was biased towards Hillary and inaccurate. Quote:CNN/ORC's snap poll, gave Clinton the win with 62 per cent to Trump's 27. It was the biggest, and fastest, exercise conducted by an opinion polling firm. The poll of 521 registered voters who watched the debate was a sample which the network warned leaned more Democratic than the average - starting the night with Clinton ahead 26 per cent among the sample. Other polls carried out afterwards gave a different outcome - handing the title to Trump. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co....lide.html#ixzz4LTGB7DJT all polls done immediately after the race are not scientific polls - CNN themselves said that theirs was not scientific. CNN's poll was so biased that they had to warn voters before the debate poll that those in their sample, i.e. those who were to vote, were diehard democrats who had already given Hillary a 26% lead even before the debate started. CNN's is the most useless poll ever. No wonder its only them and some lone chonolist at fox who say Hillary won. really? did you google "who won the debate 2016"? the polls you have given are like peter kenneth polls and the CNBC one has a disclaimer Quote:Disclaimer: This is an informal poll. Results are not scientific and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of the public as a whole. the same website carries this article - the markets call Hillary the winner How the hell can you say that CNBC and Time were biased? BTW CNN polled just 500 people while the others polled about 1m voters. yes - theirs is online. I just voted  I didn't say they were biased I just said they were not scientific not just me but they themselves too. All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/9/2009 Posts: 6,592 Location: Nairobi
|
Hillary won the debate when she walked in in full red. What a strong, domineering colour. It caught Trump off-guard.
BBI will solve it :)
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi
|
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/10/2008 Posts: 9,131 Location: Kanjo
|
Endelea kujidangany'a ni haki yako. He only did well the first 10 mins. The moment a racist, sexist and egocentric Trumpamba was confronted by a black moderator and a woman, yeye kwishad. How things have changed for the white man! i.am.back!!!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/10/2008 Posts: 9,131 Location: Kanjo
|
hardwood wrote:masukuma wrote:hardwood wrote:CNN says their poll was biased towards Hillary and inaccurate. Quote:CNN/ORC's snap poll, gave Clinton the win with 62 per cent to Trump's 27. It was the biggest, and fastest, exercise conducted by an opinion polling firm. The poll of 521 registered voters who watched the debate was a sample which the network warned leaned more Democratic than the average - starting the night with Clinton ahead 26 per cent among the sample. Other polls carried out afterwards gave a different outcome - handing the title to Trump. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co....lide.html#ixzz4LTGB7DJT all polls done immediately after the race are not scientific polls - CNN themselves said that theirs was not scientific. Nope. CNN's poll was so biased that they had to warn voters before the debate poll that those in their sample, i.e. those who were to vote, were diehard democrats who had already given Hillary a 26% lead even before the debate started. CNN's is the most useless poll ever. No wonder its only them and some lone chonolist at fox who say Hillary won. @hardwood, let me break down the CNN poll for you. I know you are not that good in math but what do these numbers compared to poll results tell you? Quote:26% of the respondents who participated in tonight's survey identified themselves as Republicans, 41% identified themselves as Democrats, and 33% identified themselves as Independents i.am.back!!!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/27/2012 Posts: 2,256 Location: Bandalungwa
|
Trump is an unconventional candidate. It does not matter whether he loses every debate. It does not matter if he says silly things that would disqualify a normal candidate. In fact some times his approval numbers edge upwards when he says silly things.
Many Americans are fed up with the status quo. They want an unconventional prezzo who will "shake things up". Thats why Trump might win.
And some Americans who think politics is boring just want a reality show president who says crazy things. Imagine Trump giving a speech at the UN.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/14/2006 Posts: 1,311
|
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
US Elections, Hillary or Trump?
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|