Let's put this clearly.

Justice Ndungu is now making a ruling on a dispute in which she is the main party. Now just how constitutional is that?

Justice Ojwang couldn't stop saying how the Supreme court is the "Apex", meaning big kahuna and all other courts must bow to him.

I can just imagine that Supreme court with Ojwang, Ndungu, Tunoi and Rawal....God save the person who gave Mutunga the wisdom to constitute this court earlier than these fellows had planned.

Now I hope the Law Society follows up with its threats on removing Ndungu.

We can't have judges who don't see a conflict in ruling on issues that they themselves are a party to. Ati Apex....Mutunga just proved hii ilikuwa korti bandia and he was the real McCoy.

Nelson Havi is having a hissy fit on Twirra. He's just been handed a judicial beat down and he can't believe it.

I can't believe it. .Instead of deciding whether she should recuse herself or not. .she is deciding why Mutunga and Smoking should not recuse themselves . ..sometimes it's good to shut up and people will think you are wise

So when a judge who's subject to a JSC summon on an issue she ruled in for which she has refused to recluse herself says she's not biased, what are we to make of it.

I think akina kingangi should adopt this as part of their comedy routine.

These fellows are just tooooo mash. Now they want a stay to the order. What they are not saying is that the Supreme court has decided that there is no court to hear their pleas.

I just don't get it. kweli what is in it to become a judge? Nasi you go home and grow potatos or something?

A good day indeed.

But there is one thing I did not get. This maneno of room to appeal. Appeal to whom? Is this not the court of last resort?

Can someone please explain this to me, slowly, with pictures if possible?