I was looking at some tweets for MindSpeak where Titus Naikuni was the guest speaker and there was all this 'feel good' stuff about KQ's growth but then a firm will grow if you throw money [capital/equity and debt] at it. What counts is profits or future profitability.
When one takes KQ since 1996, you realize there has been little growth in NAV after 17 years. An investor who bought KQ at 11.25 will get only 13 [+ sporadic dividends] after 17 years. This is little better than putting the cash under the mattress.
Which also brings me to my next point and my post
http://www.wazua.co.ke/f...px?g=posts&m=420926 Expensive Mistakes or an Education?
I will avoid shares in firms whose Board Members & Management have no significant ownership stake. And KQ was one of them where the 'buy in' from the staff, board and management was close to NIL.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett