tycho wrote:alma1 wrote:Think about this clearly.
The danger of Kenyans living in their homes for 21 days or the danger of kenyans filling up Kenyatta Hospital for 6 months. Which is worse?
And don't say it's a flu.
The question is: What is the danger of Kenyans keeping in their houses for an indefinite period with no or little support systems: or the danger of adapting and fighting to reduce the spread quickly and actively while being able to support their families?
Maybe it's a personality issue, but I prefer an an active defence. Maybe I am just hyper. Consider how easy it is for you to move from '14 days' to 21, others are talking of 3 months, what science are you folks using, so that we can know how to make that sacrifice?
Because for probably one of the few times in life, you are being presented with evidence that you can see unfolding in front of your eyes.
Those countries that wear masks have reduced their infections. Those countries that locked down have reduced their infections. Those countries that locked down early have continued with their day to day lives.
On the other hand, those countries that were talking about democratic rights and sijui poor people will not survive are just getting started on the path of economic destruction.
What else do you want to be told? A Bible quote or a wise saying?
The data is right there for you to look at.
The choice is yours.
Thieves are not good people. Tumeelewana?