wazua Wed, Jun 26, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

772 Pages«<503504505506507>»
Kenya Airways...why ignore..
VituVingiSana
#10081 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:45:23 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,064
Location: Nairobi
Seles83 wrote:
I own no shares of KQ or any stake in JKIA, but anyone can tell you that Kenya strategic location in Africa, coupled with existence of National Carrier is just a source of growth engines.

Imagine how much Dubai, Abu Thabi and Doha derived their economies from Tourism and transient travellers.

Surely as part of achieving >10% GDP growth, JKIA Expansion and KQ & JamboJet growth is integral to Kenya growth.


The debate around debt is just misplaced, the only worth considering is that is debt growing our economy? If not, we are deep trouble!!
The projects funded by debt are NOT generating a break-even ROI. Look at SGR (400-600bn including land purchases).
Let's use 400bn and at 5% = 20bn is the minimum required just to pay the "interest" but more is required to cover depreciation and principal repayments.

Personally, i think we are not investing enough in infrastructure we need 20 times faster growth, even if it is driven by debt. Kenya population is relatively young and growing really fast, so no lacking in terms of future tax payers!!


Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Seles83
#10082 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:28:33 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/9/2007
Posts: 288
Location: OZ
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains

- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies

-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project

-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.


Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..





More monies, more problems...
VituVingiSana
#10083 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 10:46:58 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,064
Location: Nairobi
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Swenani
#10084 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:04:34 AM
Rank: User


Joined: 8/15/2013
Posts: 13,236
Location: Vacuum
obiero wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
The Jambo Jet is a redemption path for KQ, perhaps they can borrow a leave from Air Asia and get a grip of the business... Lots of Capital injection required from government couple with multi billion upgrade of JKIA.

JKIA is a national disgrace especially when you visit other developing countries airports.

It would be interesting to find out which other African airports you are referring to..


are all developing countries in Africa?

China, SA, Pakistan, Croatia etc are all developing countries
If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
Seles83
#10085 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:08:51 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/9/2007
Posts: 288
Location: OZ
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see
More monies, more problems...
VituVingiSana
#10086 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:17:58 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,064
Location: Nairobi
Uganda Airlines https://www.businessdail...4984-m3a4vtz/index.html
DOA?
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#10087 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:19:09 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,064
Location: Nairobi
KQ gets additional Sh4.3bn from banks
https://www.businessdail...7624-5x9s9cz/index.html
KQ is a like an alcoholic. It's never enough.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#10088 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:21:28 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,064
Location: Nairobi
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see
There's no free lunch. The cost of these White Elephants might be horrendous.

Look at KQ [this is a KQ thread] and the "praises" for Project Mawingu which didn't take into account many of the "downsides" and we ended with an entity that wiped out 80bn+ in value.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
obiero
#10089 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 2:55:38 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,477
Location: nairobi
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see
There's no free lunch. The cost of these White Elephants might be horrendous.

Look at KQ [this is a KQ thread] and the "praises" for Project Mawingu which didn't take into account many of the "downsides" and we ended with an entity that wiped out 80bn+ in value.

Wiped out indeed, but tugange yajayo

HF 30,000 ABP 3.49; KQ 414,100 ABP 7.92; MTN 23,800 ABP 6.45
iris
#10090 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 4:35:15 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/11/2014
Posts: 228
Location: Nairobi
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.
Metch
#10091 Posted : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:05:12 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 12/22/2015
Posts: 224
Location: Mombasa, Kenya
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassignedd'oh! to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


A sick lie is what this is. What change are you talking about when all its doing is retracing the extraction route as set out by the colonialists? This mega spend will benefit Ugandan exporters and their partners to whom the balance of trade is tilted in favour.
Change would have come if this track was laid where no track has been seen before; suppose it cut through the Suguta valley and touched the upper tip of Kenya, bringing northern towns such as Wajir, Mandera, Isiolo, Moyale, Marsabit... Bringing the Pokot, Turkana, Samburu, Burji and Borana into the mainstream economy within our lifetime. Imagine if the pastoralists in these areas could get their cattle to Dagoretti slaughter in an hour and grain from Kitale could reach them in two hours... Then we could talk of real change. But the communities that have waited for infrastructure since independence are made to wait for Lapsset phase F while those who have are forced to debate the pros and cons of rehabilitating vs building.

By all means stay reassigned my friend
Start!
Impunity
#10092 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:22:30 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,325
Location: Masada
Wah.
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.

Seles83
#10093 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 3:04:03 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/9/2007
Posts: 288
Location: OZ
Metch wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassignedd'oh! to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


A sick lie is what this is. What change are you talking about when all its doing is retracing the extraction route as set out by the colonialists? This mega spend will benefit Ugandan exporters and their partners to whom the balance of trade is tilted in favour.
Change would have come if this track was laid where no track has been seen before; suppose it cut through the Suguta valley and touched the upper tip of Kenya, bringing northern towns such as Wajir, Mandera, Isiolo, Moyale, Marsabit... Bringing the Pokot, Turkana, Samburu, Burji and Borana into the mainstream economy within our lifetime. Imagine if the pastoralists in these areas could get their cattle to Dagoretti slaughter in an hour and grain from Kitale could reach them in two hours... Then we could talk of real change. But the communities that have waited for infrastructure since independence are made to wait for Lapsset phase F while those who have are forced to debate the pros and cons of rehabilitating vs building.

By all means stay reassigned my friend


It's unfortunate if you can see that change. The reason why remote around are always marginalized is always economic reasons. Unfortunately, very few remote communities practice commercial farming. Remote communities have a myriad of its own issues from crippling backward culture, natural disasters, and non-existent government infrastructure.

Investment always follow opportunities, with discovery of Oil and other minerals in Northern Kenya surely infrastructure will follow.

Honestly speaking investing 1 Trillion of infrastucture to Northern Kenya as it is now is purely a waste of resources. The population and economic activity cannot justify that kind of investment.

P.S. I came from those marginalised communities.
More monies, more problems...
Seles83
#10094 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 3:13:27 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/9/2007
Posts: 288
Location: OZ
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!
More monies, more problems...
sparkly
#10095 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 7:11:15 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 9/23/2009
Posts: 8,083
Location: Enk are Nyirobi
Seles83 wrote:
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!


Well said Sir/Madam.
Life is short. Live passionately.
obiero
#10096 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 8:48:00 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 13,477
Location: nairobi
sparkly wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!


Well said Sir/Madam.

Seles cannot be a madam..

HF 30,000 ABP 3.49; KQ 414,100 ABP 7.92; MTN 23,800 ABP 6.45
sparkly
#10097 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 9:32:46 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 9/23/2009
Posts: 8,083
Location: Enk are Nyirobi
obiero wrote:
sparkly wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!


Well said Sir/Madam.

Seles cannot be a madam..


My bad. His profile reads plug smile
Life is short. Live passionately.
VituVingiSana
#10098 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 9:33:46 AM
Rank: Chief


Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,064
Location: Nairobi
Seles83 wrote:
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!
That's a red herring argument.
Whereas infrastructure is needed, the cost of it is important. Risk/Reward Ratio.
White Elephants do not benefit society though they may benefit a few.

This is not about "optimism" "optimists" "pessimism" or "pessimists" [the red herring].
This is about sensible numbers/financials.

Let's look at ARM. Or KQ. The expansion was heavily funded by debt.

ARM: Mr Positive Paunrana even managed to convince an "army of experts in London" to lose 50% of intrinsic value in one year! And it gets worse.
KQ: The less said the better. Look up Project Mawingu.

Dubai also went through a rough patch but it had a super-wealthy cousin in Abu Dhabi. AD is a large oil producer and its coffers were full after the last run-up in oil prices.

Kenya: We need the infrastructure but paying 2x (corruption and incompetence) provides us a dismal ROE. You argued the SGR will increase tourism and trade BUT the same could have been done by rehabilitating the "old" railway [WB had a feasibility study] and expanding the Nairobi-Mombasa Road.

As a country basis, we should not leave our heirs with crazy debts [vs the assets].
Sri Lanka gave up a significant port to the Chinese in exchange for a barely used airport.

Blind optimism is easy BUT one has to be pragmatic and that means sometimes one misses out on a few opportunities.
Personal investments are OK. Take the risk. If you lose YOUR money it is YOUR money.

Kenya, on the other hand, belongs 45mn+ people (& future generations). We have to take risks but not at the low potential rewards for the risks.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Ericsson
#10099 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 9:37:19 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/4/2009
Posts: 10,646
Location: NAIROBI
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!
That's a red herring argument.
Whereas infrastructure is needed, the cost of it is important. Risk/Reward Ratio.
White Elephants do not benefit society though they may benefit a few.

This is not about "optimism" "optimists" "pessimism" or "pessimists" [the red herring].
This is about sensible numbers/financials.

Let's look at ARM. Or KQ. The expansion was heavily funded by debt.

ARM: Mr Positive Paunrana even managed to convince an "army of experts in London" to lose 50% of intrinsic value in one year! And it gets worse.
KQ: The less said the better. Look up Project Mawingu.

Dubai also went through a rough patch but it had a super-wealthy cousin in Abu Dhabi. AD is a large oil producer and its coffers were full after the last run-up in oil prices.

Kenya: We need the infrastructure but paying 2x (corruption and incompetence) provides us a dismal ROE. You argued the SGR will increase tourism and trade BUT the same could have been done by rehabilitating the "old" railway [WB had a feasibility study] and expanding the Nairobi-Mombasa Road.

As a country basis, we should not leave our heirs with crazy debts [vs the assets].
Sri Lanka gave up a significant port to the Chinese in exchange for a barely used airport.

Blind optimism is easy BUT one has to be pragmatic and that means sometimes one misses out on a few opportunities.
Personal investments are OK. Take the risk. If you lose YOUR money it is YOUR money.

Kenya, on the other hand, belongs 45mn+ people (& future generations). We have to take risks but not at the low potential rewards for the risks.


Fully agree with you on this one @vvs
Wealth is built through a relatively simple equation
Wealth=Income + Investments - Lifestyle
Ericsson
#10100 Posted : Wednesday, June 13, 2018 9:41:20 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 12/4/2009
Posts: 10,646
Location: NAIROBI
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
iris wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
VituVingiSana wrote:
Seles83 wrote:
I think the Jubilee government is not doing itself service in quantifying the ROI, the ROI on investment is actually high. Elements to consider:

- Increased new traffic (people) to coast, quantify consumer spending and new investments by public and private sector to harness the gains
False equivalency. Tourism to the coast could be just as high or higher if there was a good road. If one can drive from Nairobi (Kangemi/CBD/Langata) to Mombasa (CBD/Nyali/Bamburi) in 5 hours (100km/h) then who needs the hassle of going from Kangemi/CBD/Langata to Syokimau to Miritini to CBD/Nyali/Bamburi?
- The reduction of use of road transport hence less maintenance
Reduced maintenance for the road but surely the SGR also needs maintenance? Plus the old railway could have been rehabilitated at a fraction of the cost.

- Significant reduction of commuting time hence increased productivity and capital efficiencies
False equivalency. The only reason SGR is "attractive" is coz of the current state of the NBO-MSA road. Single lane most of the way with sections that are poorly designed or in bad shape e.g. Miritini to CBD.
-New efficiencies achieved through the learning of completion of such major project (easier to implement future projects)
I have no idea what that means.
-etc etc

We are already past 5%, and it is only going to increase once the utilization approaches over 80% and completion of the project.
Transporters/importers are being coerced in using SGR. Many prefer trucks which can deliver to the final destination.
Just have a look at Thika and try and quantify the gains. Clearly ROI of 80% is too little...Kenya is heading place, corruption is just slowly us down..



What most people seem to most is that they are always talking about the ideal situation, and completely miss the point completely. The new rail system is changing the Kenya Infrastructure landscape. A new dawn to Kenya, a big step to the true vision of Kenya!!

I have reassigned to believe that corruption is part of Kenyan culture and not synonymous with leadership. It has become a way of life!!

We see


How long have we been learning to implement "future projects" and yet our bridges are still collapsing? Anyway @Seles83, you sound a little bit like Mutua when he was the GOK spokesman.



One thing I have learned about critics is that they rarely spot any opportunities. Instead, they focus on what is obvious. Kenya is really growing, so get out of your comfort zone travel around Nairobi....You learn more by observing the movement of capital and investment rather than reading Newspaper or TV News.

I always compare a place from where it was 5 yrs and 10 yrs ago and then imagine where it is going to be in 5 yrs, 10 yrs and 20 yrs time.

Corruption will always be there (sadly part of the culture now) and Critics will always be louder.

Is Kenya perfect nope, but it is it improving ...Oh Yes!!

I have never met anyone who has really made tonnes of money or brought about major change by being pessimistic.

Be a relentless optimistic and your mindset will change dramatically. We have many critics but few change agents!!
That's a red herring argument.
Whereas infrastructure is needed, the cost of it is important. Risk/Reward Ratio.
White Elephants do not benefit society though they may benefit a few.

This is not about "optimism" "optimists" "pessimism" or "pessimists" [the red herring].
This is about sensible numbers/financials.

Let's look at ARM. Or KQ. The expansion was heavily funded by debt.

ARM: Mr Positive Paunrana even managed to convince an "army of experts in London" to lose 50% of intrinsic value in one year! And it gets worse.
KQ: The less said the better. Look up Project Mawingu.

Dubai also went through a rough patch but it had a super-wealthy cousin in Abu Dhabi. AD is a large oil producer and its coffers were full after the last run-up in oil prices.

Kenya: We need the infrastructure but paying 2x (corruption and incompetence) provides us a dismal ROE. You argued the SGR will increase tourism and trade BUT the same could have been done by rehabilitating the "old" railway [WB had a feasibility study] and expanding the Nairobi-Mombasa Road.

As a country basis, we should not leave our heirs with crazy debts [vs the assets].
Sri Lanka gave up a significant port to the Chinese in exchange for a barely used airport.

Blind optimism is easy BUT one has to be pragmatic and that means sometimes one misses out on a few opportunities.
Personal investments are OK. Take the risk. If you lose YOUR money it is YOUR money.

Kenya, on the other hand, belongs 45mn+ people (& future generations). We have to take risks but not at the low potential rewards for the risks.


Even Centum is now beginning to feel the pinch
Wealth is built through a relatively simple equation
Wealth=Income + Investments - Lifestyle
Users browsing this topic
Guest (13)
772 Pages«<503504505506507>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.