Liv wrote:@McReggae,
It is true MK had pockets of support from some areas. Have you already concluded that UMK cannot get such pockets of support from RV, Kisii, Coast, NE for himself?
You are right the effect of UMK coming from Central might affect him.... Don't you think the perceived non-performance of RO as a principal in this government might also affect him?
What I am just saying is that.... the belief that in a runoff between RO and UMK...RO will obviously win...does not hold water. It is just that...a belief.... it is only based on the belief that Kenyans will wake up and say ...it is 41 against 1. It is like that pre 2005 belief that ...a Raila cannot be president...a Luo cannot be president....which many people believed until they were confounded.
It is the other strategies that UMK and RO will employ that will determine who will be President in case they have a runoff....it is not that belief (41 against 1).
@Keraka, no one is offended. I did not say who won 2007 elections.... but it is a fact.... the race was too close to call....even all polls showed that.
@liv, I'm writing this in the hope that you live among Kenyans [all tribes].
Do you own sampling of the various tribes in the rift and ask them between RAO and UK, whom would they vote for? There is no 41 against 1,no such thing.
In the rift,two tribes one represented by the prince have historical issues brought bare by PEV.Then there is the "land" issue to the rest of thee country. Are you wishing all that away in order to qualify keraka's thinking as belief?
I was in the thick of in 08 and what i know is,kuna mafuta na maji.
Let's just think without getting a tad desperate.