alma wrote:@tycho honestly. unless you know something we don't know, what do you mean by gov't sponsored killings? Someone shot the fellow, I don't know who. But it seems you do. Find the nearest police station and help in the investigations.
The police have the mandate to quell rowdy youth. In fact they have to. So if their pain is the passing of the cleric, I'm sure a long prayer in the mosque will do. But burning people's property, they are lucky they aren't being shot.
That is not bigotry tycho, that is law and order.
My comment is a conditional that runs like this:
If the government is supposed to protect her citizens against all 'harm' then it must be prepared to do all that is needed to attain this goal. And, indeed, it is known that the government has killed 'thugs', 'armed dissenters' like Matakwei and the like.
Besides, there are 'stories' in which a government, like during the cold war, was involved in assassinating some person. And of course, there are incidences where people have spoken of 'extra-judicial killings'.
Now what I am questioning is the validity of such an argument and its truth to humanity especially when the 'disturbing forces' are unarmed and purely ideological.
Certainly, if the government says, we will not talk to 'terrorists' then it must surely affirm terror.