Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/19/2011 Posts: 1,694
|
limanika wrote:Kratos wrote:limanika wrote:Kratos wrote:Quote: More recently, on 4 December 2013, a key second witness in the case confessed to giving false evidence regarding a critical event in the Prosecution’s case. This witness has now been withdrawn from the Prosecution witness list. Having carefully considered my evidence and the impact of the two withdrawals, I have come to the conclusion that currently the case against Mr. Kenyatta does not satisfy the high evidentiary standards required at trial. ICC websiteOne thing i dont understand, was the case meant to withstand trial with these two witnesses? Where was the prosecutor during investigations such that they didn't notice the false evidence by one of the witnesses. Do not read too much. This looks like exit strategy.. i think the unexpected hand shake has something to do with it   I give you a D- for the conspiracy theory there! The handshake was after the withdrawals. Please keep your D-. … what ‘’withdrawal’’ took place before the handshake? That of the witnesses or the case?
“People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one, and if you repeat it frequently enough, people will sooner or later believe it.” ― Walter C. Langer
|