Kenyatta was homeguardism through and through. If you were a homeguard, you made it.

Moi was not a tribalist. The proof is the number of psychophants in his gov't who were spread out in each and every community. There is no single community which did not have a chotara like character.

Kibaki was Muthaigaism - Which wasn't that bad when you think about it. We got great projects done by him and his nusu mkate gov't

Uhuru is on another level. Uthamakistan is real. I lived through these gov't's and I can assure you that the only comparison to the behavior of Uthamakistan is none of the above.

The above are just my personal views and are unlikely to change based on the comments from Uthamakistanians on this forum.

Clearly, you did not know Moi. You would know who filled all the top positions and messengers in government and parastatals. Kenyatta was a homeguard in prison?

I know it's popular these days for people to try and change history. History doesn't work like that.

I saw a post here of someone blaming Raila for the 82 coup. History says otherwise. In fact history says the homeguards in the first gov't tried each and every trick in the book to remove him or simply not have him as president.

I am aware of the number of Kaleos in parastatal jobs at his time. But when you really think about it, what was the number of kyuks in the same parastatals? Or before Moi? Numbers, please. Don't forget to add the current gov't. Numbers, please.

Moi was a dictator. Calling him a tribalist is minimizing the mess that was created. All current political leaders from Uhuru, Kalonzo, Raila, Ruto, name them are Kanu children. All of the them. Labda Joho, Sonko na Kabogo.

This Uthamakistan is a new breed. Bred by the fake notion that Kikuyus were suppressed during Moi's time. Kwani who were Kamotho, Chotara, Kenyatta, Kibaki, Saitoti? Indians?

Masukuma is on point.

That okuyos should lie low like envelopes (antelopes)???