Some correction on the article. Praful Shah formerly of Trust Bank is not in hiding. A friend works for him and meets him almost daily

Personally I am underwhelmed by the investigative work being done by the Kenyan partners involved in these leaks.

The shady dealings of a grandmother and a long forgotten ponzi scheme is not explosive material.

The Kenyan client was Mr Ndakwe, an author of several Christian books and whose born-again credentials endeared him to the pyramid scheme victims. Mr Ndakwe also ran another company, Kings Script Publishers Ltd, which not only published his books, but also collected money from the public

As a Kenyan judge, one is subject to the special constitutional requirement to uphold "high moral character", there is no hair splitting on this. If so many Kenyans are saying what she is doing in assisting capital flight for years from Kenya is immoral, if the entire global press thinks these are immoral people, why shouldn't the judiciary drop her immediately for the questions arising from her association with well known thugs? She will wait for courti bandia about her morals the same way she is fighting the constitution on the very clear 70 year age limit. The JSC told us this woman is a liar, did she tell JSC about her side hustle as a capital flight expert!!! Now this! This panama thing is associated with thieves, conman, capital flight experts, it seems everyone in the world including those who released this details were clearly exposing the stinking potholes of the Illuminati.

are there perfectly legal reasons to have briefcase companies in liechtenstein, panama or jersey islands? if so - then then why put a blanket statement on all names that appear on this website? again who really wants to pay tax unless they have to? if you find a perfectly legal way to skive taxation and the nosey taxman - more power to you!

I am not sure about this jurisdiction but in some countries - this data would not be admissible in court! it was the result of an illegality to begin with and that ruins the case. there are cases where a former police dog sniffs the boot of a car and smells narcotics then gives the narcotics found sign and the police officer who now owns the dog arrests the owner and opens the boot - the case is thrown out because the means of getting evidence is just as important as the court case itself. if evidence is all that mattered then why do we frown upon torture?