Welcome back Nancy and congratulations for your level-head.

Patience Pays in Guaranteed Checks

@mpenzi,i think you are wasting my time. why do i say so? i have clearly stated that parliament in its delibarations,it does not require a law but rather standing orders to ascertain whether they can vote on a matter or not. You are insisting that there must a law then give it to us.

on a light note why don't simply post all our parliamentary standing orders on sk and i shall point out which is relevant in this current situation.



wote

Wote,just admit it,you know not what law or standing order you,yourself and only you raised as the basis of what transpired.

The tragedy with our nation is that the ground shifts under our feet and just like those fellas singing in the titanic while it sank we continue to mouth the politicians ballad and refuse to recognise the enormity of our calamity.

@ Nanfor,

Don't I love your mind? Of course I do...many Kenyans always miss the point in many of the crises facing us....but of course no shocker because the MPs come from this lot of Kenyans.

Nanfor,for your kind of mind,you must have been born on Christmas day,where as a 'supposed' infant,you were wondering what the hell adults were doing to celebrate the birth of Christ.....even then they had missed the point and made it a commercial break. Noel!

My busaa or milf offer still remains.


We tenda wema kisha wende zako. Usinipe macho ya kutarajia shukrani!!!

You will make noise and at the end of it all kibaki will triumph. The main intention of the re-appointment had nothing to do with the KACC,be bright and stop thinking like primary school kids who make decisions basing on what they are seein. Wait and see

A likely impossibility is always preferable to an unconvincing posibility.

@Wote,Mpenzi & Brewer,
Who is wasting whose time? He he he.

Out of raw anger,Parliament did what they didnt have any locus standii to do.
As such their effort and time is not good for...much.
What they did,amount s to a mere opinion of the house.
It is not good enough to get Ringera out of the job.
If they really want Ringera gone,their recourse lies in starving KACC of funds,eventually collapsing it - a defeatist move if you ask me.
Otherwise in law they have no power to get him out - in the sense of sacking.
Citing standing orders 5to justify this,is laughable to say the least.
Standing orders are REGULATIONS OF THE HOUSE.
They only apply to MPs and their conduct in relation to the house business.

Alternatively though,MPs could repeal the law upon which KACC is anchored,and disband it as a result.
Until they do this,Ringera may choose to continue showing them the middle finger!

I say all the above,not because Ringera is a darling of mine. Far from it.
I hold the opinion that in so far as corruption is concerned,Ringera is part of the problem.
I am also aware that even if he did his job perfectly well,and Wako stopped the flow of the process,as he is wont of doing,his efforts would still come to nought.
Kibaki is obviously aware of all these nauseating bottle-necks,but he is happy with them right in place!
Who will help us.


B.timer

I agree that personalising issues is not the way to go,rather we need to reform our institituons.however even with the limited powers he has,ringera has completely failed to demonstrate even meagre results.all he ever does is complain.and ofcourse there is the perception that his reappointment has everything to do with the president wanting to protect an elite group around him that have engaged in dubious acts over the years.

my point.ringera,wako etc must go.but even more important is a new constitution that removes imperial powers from the presidency and ensures public appointees are accountable to their taxpayer employers and NOT the executive.

@wote
for the upteenth time we ask of you - please quote the provision of law that allows parliament to nullify a gazette notice. stop obscuring this straightforward question by quoting cases.