Katwa sounds like he is exonerating Ruto instead of Sang. Mpaka Katerina akachanganyikiwa

Ocampo has a lot of work to do. But he could claim the suspects flew from Amagoro, Nairobi, nyanza and Bungoma(for Kapondi)

Ocampo has been claiming many things without any collaborating evidence and that is why his case is being watered down by the defense...I doubt he will go that road. Pilots keep very accurate logs of where they flew and how long it took them to get there.

Ocambo could also be having some call logs from the likes of safcom. those are also very accurate. they tell where you were at the exact moment you made/received a call/message. they can actually prove you were at amagoro in the morning and later in the evening at serena beach. i don't think ocambo just has no case.

bado mapambano hapa.

I have also been wondering about KG-whether he is WR's legal counsel or AS.

Was he the best AS could choose given that ICC agreed to pay for his legal counsel?
To me he just isn't doing his job right

The problem is that the prosecution has to show that they have enough evidence and case to go to full trial. The judges cannot make a decision on perceived evidence. This was the right time to show some of that hard evidence which our friend LMO has not done at all. At most he has redacted documents in a ploy to show that they contain important information. Look at how he made a radio broadcast confidential, yet the same broadcast was listened to by thousands around the world? Isn't that a man who is trying to pull show he has more than he actually does?

I think many people dont get it. Sang and Ruto are co-accused. Ruto's name has to come up almost all the time. The idea is to prove that Ruto was elsewhere at the times its alleged they had meetings with Sang. Whats wrong with this?? It also appears that majority of wazuans arent aware that Sang's time to take the defence stand is not yet, till today afte, maybe thats when you will hear Sang's name more frequently as you desire.

Well, the three kenyan lawyers are experienced and to me , they have performed much better than one Ocampo, the supposed "people's hero". Totally useless fellow.

kweli kabisa. and especially that Ocampo bit. ndongomothi!

Kingfisher this is the evidence he should table in the confirmation hearing. Clearly this guy did not conduct investigations, otherwise defense would not be having it easy.

Yes. These are the confirmation hearings only. Lets consider.

One of the suspects is said to have got 'generals' and 'commanders' who executed the plan using their military expertise.

Like a mouse strolling into the cats' yard, one of these 'commanders' appears in this yard to be questioned. (he becomes hostile in the yard but that is neither here nor there.)

Not surprisingly and seemingly feebly, the prosecution confirms from him that indeed he has had experience in tactical military matters. On the very same point in which he is being said to have been involved!

It is unclear what the prosecution was expected to do that they have not done. This not being the trial and was not intended to be even a mini trial.

One they have confirmed one part of their evidence that the 'commander' can indeed 'command'. This is the 'confirmation hearing'

Now they will seek to prove the second part that he participated as they allege. This will be the trial.

Anyone who does not see that these are confirmation hearings and thinks they are the trial will be confounded.

Talk of playing into hands of the prosecution.....