The PROCESS cannot invalidate the will of the people. The will of the people is expressed when they vote- put their ballot in the paper, and that has to be protected as it is a Constitution right. The process, how the IEBC tallies and the technology used is in the Elections law, and that is inferior to the constitution.

The Judges are also cognizant of the politics. They may reprimand IEBC on some omissions, but would not make a ruling that will open floodgates for losers to flock the court on process issues.

My 2 cents as a layman

You may have a point. I have been thinking about the massive Judicial and political onslaught that NASA has mounted against institutions to date and it simply doesn't make sense unless as a strategy to justify yet more 'reforms.' Of course it would have also been useful folder if the elections results were close but they were not.

My only question is who will carry these new 'reforms' forward. The only one with the cojones to do so is RAO and I don't really see him sitting on the tarmac and inhaling teargas again. He is just tired and simply wants a face saving way out from all this. The other clowns will be laughed out of town.

The Court will not have the time to do figure by figure comparison of 40,883 (34A) Reporting Polling Stations to 290 (34B) unless NASA has specifics.

In a controlled Court environment, Can IEBC be ordered to simulate/re-transmit figures from polling stations randomly i.e. the returning officers sit at Kasarani/Bomas for a day with KIEMS kits and 34s and do the process again. The rest of us "party agents" can sit on the tarrace watching Sinema in big screen? I want to meet Mr 11% in person

Missed out on the live IT ruling. ButI have watched it and it seems very fair. The court has excellent advisors. Muites confidence is telling. Nothing to hide

to prove what? if the said process did not contribute to the declaration of Uhuru as winner - what is the point?

Now they're saying that some ballot papers may have been printed in Kenya. Is there an end to their claims?

Was it ballot papers or some forms - 34A&B.

QUOTED FROM NATION NEWSPAPERS:

"Ballots used in the August 8 presidential election were not the ones printed by the Dubai firm contracted by IEBC, lawyers for Nasa leader Raila Odinga have said.

In his opening submission to the Supreme Court, lawyer James Orengo said analysis of the ballots used in the election had shown that most of them fell short of statutory security requirements, suggesting that they may have been printed locally.

The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) gave the Sh2.5 billion ballots printing tender to al Ghurair of Dubai.

Mr Orengo, who is also the lawyer from Siaya, further said most of the documents IEBC had submitted to the court as instruments they used to declare the presidential results fell short of legal requirements.

Some of the security features that were to be contained in forms 34A and 34B are water marks, anti-copying features and others that can only be detected under UV light."

Of course it would have to take the UN to conduct the election as Raila cant trust anybody here in Kenya.
Our Military, the Police, IEBC everybody cant passmuster

Does he have the facts? Were there 11000 34A missing at the time of the anouncement? Are they quoting the Acts in completion? Clever lawyers using half truths. NASA'a continuous questioning of IEBC actually put the body on the alert thus eroding their chance to have a case