wazua Mon, Jun 29, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

32 Pages«<2526272829>»
Uhuru's Address
Wamunyota
#261 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:39:23 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 6/23/2014
Posts: 1,652
McReggae wrote:
Who stands to gain from his action? Himself as he can't be asked any questions regarding non cooperation of the Kenyan govt, hii in gone yote hamna, historic, zilch! seems the gang is so used to unlawfulness of the prince that any action as per the law is historic and we must bow down! check my 1st comment on this thread. 'That was presidential'.......it remains that and not something that deserves a Nobel prize yawa!!!!


Googles zitakuua.
Why was yesterday historic?
1)Uhuru accepting to go to the Hague.Uhuru had an option to go or not to go to the Hague.some of his advisors held the position that he shouldnt go to the hague because the AU resolution was clear that no sitting president should be charged at the ICC.
If Uhuru didnt go there was a political risk in kenya where sactions could be issued to pressurize the country.This means we will have lower investments in the country,weak shilling,job losses,civil unrests and chaos.Uhuru decided to go putting these factors into consideration and country first.It is a humiliating experience.
2)Appointing William Ruto as the Acting President.This means he isnt going to the hague as Uhuru the president but Uhuru the person.The instruments of power are with Ruto and this safeguards our Sovereignty.Kenya as a country is not on trial.
Hutia Mundu!!
McReggae
#262 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:42:36 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
Wamunyota wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Who stands to gain from his action? Himself as he can't be asked any questions regarding non cooperation of the Kenyan govt, hii in gone yote hamna, historic, zilch! seems the gang is so used to unlawfulness of the prince that any action as per the law is historic and we must bow down! check my 1st comment on this thread. 'That was presidential'.......it remains that and not something that deserves a Nobel prize yawa!!!!


Googles zitakuua.
Why was yesterday historic?
1)Uhuru accepting to go to the Hague.Uhuru had an option to go or not to go to the Hague.some of his advisors held the position that he shouldnt go to the hague because the AU resolution was clear that no sitting president should be charged at the ICC.
If Uhuru didnt go there was a political risk in kenya where sactions could be issued to pressurize the country.This means we will have lower investments in the country,weak shilling,job losses,civil unrests and chaos.Uhuru decided to go putting these factors into consideration and country first.It is a humiliating experience.
2)Appointing William Ruto as the Acting President.This means he isnt going to the hague as Uhuru the president but Uhuru the person.The instruments of power are with Ruto and this safeguards our Sovereignty.Kenya as a country is not on trial.


Hahahaha eti option of not going aka breaking international law, that is a normal option for you, historic indeed!
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
Wamunyota
#263 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:45:42 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 6/23/2014
Posts: 1,652
McReggae wrote:
Wamunyota wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Who stands to gain from his action? Himself as he can't be asked any questions regarding non cooperation of the Kenyan govt, hii in gone yote hamna, historic, zilch! seems the gang is so used to unlawfulness of the prince that any action as per the law is historic and we must bow down! check my 1st comment on this thread. 'That was presidential'.......it remains that and not something that deserves a Nobel prize yawa!!!!


Googles zitakuua.
Why was yesterday historic?
1)Uhuru accepting to go to the Hague.Uhuru had an option to go or not to go to the Hague.some of his advisors held the position that he shouldnt go to the hague because the AU resolution was clear that no sitting president should be charged at the ICC.
If Uhuru didnt go there was a political risk in kenya where sactions could be issued to pressurize the country.This means we will have lower investments in the country,weak shilling,job losses,civil unrests and chaos.Uhuru decided to go putting these factors into consideration and country first.It is a humiliating experience.
2)Appointing William Ruto as the Acting President.This means he isnt going to the hague as Uhuru the president but Uhuru the person.The instruments of power are with Ruto and this safeguards our Sovereignty.Kenya as a country is not on trial.


Hahahaha eti option of not going aka breaking international law, that is a normal option for you, historic indeed!


And because it is normal that is why Al Bashir is at the hague?
Hutia Mundu!!
simonkabz
#264 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:47:10 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/2/2007
Posts: 8,776
Location: Cameroon
Njung'e wrote:
Getting a kick from OdOmOs like you.....coming hot on the heels of the caning,i can't just keep off.Poor young man

smile smile smile Guka tiga pris. He has been very cold and edgy.....hataki kusikia kamwana akitajwa mahali. He will quote your community in 5....
TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
McReggae
#265 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:48:19 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
Wamunyota wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Wamunyota wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Who stands to gain from his action? Himself as he can't be asked any questions regarding non cooperation of the Kenyan govt, hii in gone yote hamna, historic, zilch! seems the gang is so used to unlawfulness of the prince that any action as per the law is historic and we must bow down! check my 1st comment on this thread. 'That was presidential'.......it remains that and not something that deserves a Nobel prize yawa!!!!


Googles zitakuua.
Why was yesterday historic?
1)Uhuru accepting to go to the Hague.Uhuru had an option to go or not to go to the Hague.some of his advisors held the position that he shouldnt go to the hague because the AU resolution was clear that no sitting president should be charged at the ICC.
If Uhuru didnt go there was a political risk in kenya where sactions could be issued to pressurize the country.This means we will have lower investments in the country,weak shilling,job losses,civil unrests and chaos.Uhuru decided to go putting these factors into consideration and country first.It is a humiliating experience.
2)Appointing William Ruto as the Acting President.This means he isnt going to the hague as Uhuru the president but Uhuru the person.The instruments of power are with Ruto and this safeguards our Sovereignty.Kenya as a country is not on trial.


Hahahaha eti option of not going aka breaking international law, that is a normal option for you, historic indeed!


And because it is normal that is why Al Bashir is at the hague?


Aha, I see your reference is a law breaker who in your opinion your president should copy, such a low opinion of your leader!
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
masukuma
#266 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:48:43 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/4/2006
Posts: 13,823
Location: Nairobi
One hot day a hyena was strolling through an orchard till he came to a bunch of mangoes just ripening on a tree. “Just the things to quench my thirst,” he thought. Drawing back a few paces, he took a run and a jump, and just missed the fruit. Turning round again with a One, Two, Three, he jumped up, but with no greater success. Again and again he tried getting his mouth on one of the tempting mangoes, but at last had to give it up, and walked away with his nose in the air, saying: “I am sure they are sour.”
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
Wamunyota
#267 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:51:56 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 6/23/2014
Posts: 1,652
masukuma wrote:
One hot day a hyena was strolling through an orchard till he came to a bunch of mangoes just ripening on a tree. “Just the things to quench my thirst,” he thought. Drawing back a few paces, he took a run and a jump, and just missed the fruit. Turning round again with a One, Two, Three, he jumped up, but with no greater success. Again and again he tried getting his mouth on one of the tempting mangoes, but at last had to give it up, and walked away with his nose in the air, saying: “I am sure they are sour.”

Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly
Hutia Mundu!!
Wamunyota
#268 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:54:07 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 6/23/2014
Posts: 1,652
McReggae wrote:
Wamunyota wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Wamunyota wrote:
McReggae wrote:
Who stands to gain from his action? Himself as he can't be asked any questions regarding non cooperation of the Kenyan govt, hii in gone yote hamna, historic, zilch! seems the gang is so used to unlawfulness of the prince that any action as per the law is historic and we must bow down! check my 1st comment on this thread. 'That was presidential'.......it remains that and not something that deserves a Nobel prize yawa!!!!


Googles zitakuua.
Why was yesterday historic?
1)Uhuru accepting to go to the Hague.Uhuru had an option to go or not to go to the Hague.some of his advisors held the position that he shouldnt go to the hague because the AU resolution was clear that no sitting president should be charged at the ICC.
If Uhuru didnt go there was a political risk in kenya where sactions could be issued to pressurize the country.This means we will have lower investments in the country,weak shilling,job losses,civil unrests and chaos.Uhuru decided to go putting these factors into consideration and country first.It is a humiliating experience.
2)Appointing William Ruto as the Acting President.This means he isnt going to the hague as Uhuru the president but Uhuru the person.The instruments of power are with Ruto and this safeguards our Sovereignty.Kenya as a country is not on trial.


Hahahaha eti option of not going aka breaking international law, that is a normal option for you, historic indeed!


And because it is normal that is why Al Bashir is at the hague?


Aha, I see your reference is a law breaker who in your opinion your president should copy, such a low opinion of your leader!


How many presidents have been summoned by the ICC?
Hutia Mundu!!
Nandwa
#269 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:55:20 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 11/17/2009
Posts: 1,049
thuks
#270 Posted : Tuesday, October 07, 2014 6:51:42 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/8/2008
Posts: 1,575


Literature paper I
1. Who said those words and what was the context in which they were said?
2.What was the attitude of the speaker towards the court?
I care!
32 Pages«<2526272829>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.