ngapat wrote:The petitioner only managed to cast doubts on the process but could not show how that affected the will of the people. The judges should not have owned those doubts and then go ahead to make a ruling because they doubt the process. Ruling is supposed to be based on facts not doubts.
I still need to see how uhuru did not get 8.2m votes or how Raila got more than that
I disagree with the ruling, but accept.
I however keep an open mind, so that once the full judgement is out I might just agree with the judges if they demonstrate a well grounded reasoning of their verdict - how real and extensive the problem was. Of course the issue of implications of the ruling is a different matter altogether,
Now let me attempt to answer your question from the 4 Judges' perspective;
The process by which IEBC conducted the election was contrary to the constitution – they ignored, failed or refused to follow what the constitution demands.
Upon so ignoring, they devised and used their own process replete with integrity issues. The result arising thereof is hence lacking in integrity.
Isuni yilu yi maa me muyo - ni Mbisuu