One or two Lawyers fumbled a bit over that question really. But given the context one can understand their cluelessness. That question was asked ad hoc and on the last day of the case. A lawyer who had been hired to act for IEBC or Uhuru Kenyatta only a few days earlier may not be versed with all workings of IEBC.
Of course given time and opportunity to check with IEBC, answering that question wouldn’t have been a difficult thing at all.

Personally I thought that question was harmless and only meant to inform the Judges on IEBC procedural matters.

I mean different voters will act differently – If I do not wish to vote for MCA, Woman Rep etc, I may put their ballots in their respective boxes unmarked, another voter may put all of the un-marked ballots in one random box, another voter may chose to purposely spoil them one way or the other, another voter may just leave them on the table or on the ground etc.

Depending on where and the condition in which the ballot papers are eventually found they will be treated as spoilt, rejected, stray, unused, etc as the case may be.

Please don't say ftp access again. If I give you ftp access you can do shit to me. Ask wazua and their common down times.

That in itself is not an issue. Because as admin I can give anyone I want ftp access. What is telling is that IEBC did not even bother answering that question in court. Not a single lawyer from IEBC even had the courage you have here on wazua to state anything close to what you have said

Murchr, it seems you wrote Njoki Ndungus opinion piece. I want you to explain clearly. And in english. Why IEBC lawyers could not explain in court

1. The results on their portal. What were they? They said "statistics". Please give me a Jubilee lawyer who can explain in legal terms what "statistics" mean. So that portal even to IEBC was fake.

2. When they were asked by Lady Philomena Mwilu, what happens when you have 5 voting papers and I decide to only have one. The lawyers in court, did not even have a clue to the answer.

Murchr, how you pay these lawyers is something you have to explain to the public

Ahmednassir as usual was a cry baby in court. Sijui coup de ta by a court sijui what. All I heard from Ahmednassir was numbers. My friends, Orengo never filed a single affidavit doubting the numbers.

Ahmednassir was like a woman who you tell you are horny. Then she proceeds to massage your back.

Didn't deal with the issue at hand and he lost. Hopefully, no one shall ever use this guy in the Supreme court because he's been proven to be fake. A lady bird that needs to be papaswad for it's wings to fly.

@alma is like miguna miguna. When he wants to make a point, it is laced with so much bravado and condescending conjecture,it's impossible to go past the fourth line

I
https://www.kenyainsights.com/jirongo/

And have these MPs from western filed petitions? Ama ni more bravado?

Yada yada punguza. We are heading to the ballot