VituVingiSana wrote:
1) KK wud have paid KShs 600mn to KPRL.. They did not have to (or so it seems) now
2) KPRL might have been forced to enter into a 'quality' agreement i.e. minimum production levels
My support for KK remains steadfast... And thru it all I have bought shares in KK not sold a single one... I see 20/- in 3 years! [Meets my 30% goal]
I am a KK shareholder and I would like the best for KK. What I'm not comfortable with is todays release on their website. Let me C&P it and highlight some parts. In the previous releases you'll see he's been accusing everyone and there was what I would consider 'disclosure' of information. Today's statement is a break from the norm and this only means the settlement did not favor KK. Let's wait for the real info to leak out and you'll see.
KenolKobil-KPRL Dispute ResolvedThe Management of KenolKobil is pleased to announce that a full and final settlement of the subject dispute was signed on 7th October 2010.
KenolKobil Limited and Kenya Petroleum Refineries Limited shall also discontinue all pending claims between each other, including debit notes and law suits.The Ministry of Energy and the Energy Regulatory Commission have been
very instrumental and well informed during the whole negotiation process and in the final agreement.
With the disputes behind us, both parties are fully committed to working for the wellbeing of the Oil Industry in Kenya and the Region.
J. I. Segman
Chairman & Group Managing DirectorAccept my apologies for hijacking this KQ thread.
BBI will solve it :)