@ Mukiha!!!
This where matters become complicated:
If I attacked you with a panga and you pulled out your gun and shot me dead, you would have a very good case of self defence.
If on the other hand I attacked you with the panga and injured you, then the following day you came to my house and shot and killed my brother, that would not qualify as self-defence.
Good judgement!!!
The Kiambaa attack and Naivasha revenge are seen as two independent events in the eyes of a disinterested party (Ocampo)....unless this happened in a war situation.
Now some might argue that the PEV was a war, but technically, now war was declared [even between the fighting communities], not even a state of emergency was declared.
However; for those of us who lived through the PEV,
Everyone who is alive today lived through it!!!
And indeed some lived through worst situations than Mikiha and co., I myself lost some property and was never compensated!!!
we can see some justification for the Naivasha attack in response to the one at Kiambaa.
OMG!!!
I cant believe this is coming from MUKIHA!!!!
I have always thought that this guy not only can he be a mentor but also a role model.
ANYONE guilty should face justice, be it my brother, neighbor, tribes-mate, my MP, or my HoS!!!
Indeed, I have heard arguments that the Naivasha incident was the reason that the PEV ended.
This is why I say that this is a complicated matter. I don't think it can be solved through legal means alone [ICC or local tribunal]
Is this justification for the PEV? Oh my, f**k that!!!
Please someone just tell me that we don't have a fox in sheep's skin!!! Was it a slip of the tongue?
"Never regret, if its good, its wonderful. If its bad, its experience."