wazua Mon, Dec 29, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

8 Pages<1234>»
2017 PEV Orchestration
Njung'e
#21 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 11:51:36 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/7/2007
Posts: 11,935
Location: Nairobi
Use of live ammunition on citizens is wrong and unacceptable even at times when the said protesters are quite unreasonable. I think the police have other civil and reasonable ways of handling the protesters. How about locking down the affected slums and man the roads to and from with roadblocks? Allow only peaceful residents in and out. The rest of the town dwellers will go about their business as usual. If the slum dwellers decide to destroy and burn down their infrastructure like they have done with Olympic Primary School, allow them to.
Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm.
tycho
#22 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 12:08:45 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Nandwa wrote:
Mubebelezano uishe.
Let RAO be told the naked truth.
The people who are dying as a result of the ill advised chaotic protests are squarely due to him - RAO.

Why is it taboo to tell RAO the hard truth!


And what is this truth? That Raila lost 'fairly'? How much do we know about this?

Consider this other 'truth'. The courts are the best suited to determine the truth.

But what happens in instances where 'truth' threatens the status quo and the imminent change is deemed too costly, even by some of those who are to determine the truth?

I'd like to use the example of the ICC cases against the now president elect and his deputy. Considering the lobbying and jockeying that was evident, the ICC had to consider the threat to its existence and it's probable that this was an influence in how the court decided to deal with the cases.

The big question now is how we can negotiate truth in a pluralist society, and also how and whether this truth can be enforced or effected.

We lose it when we define the problem simply as, 'Raila'.
tycho
#23 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 12:13:48 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Njung'e wrote:
Use of live ammunition on citizens is wrong and unacceptable even at times when the said protesters are quite unreasonable. I think the police have other civil and reasonable ways of handling the protesters. How about locking down the affected slums and man the roads to and from with roadblocks? Allow only peaceful residents in and out. The rest of the town dwellers will go about their business as usual. If the slum dwellers decide to destroy and burn down their infrastructure like they have done with Olympic Primary School, allow them to.


Like in say, 'Gaza'?

Try and find out whether there are areas referred to as 'Gaza' here in Kenya, and why those places are given those names.

So far, many of us seem to be okay with reasoning out what's happening, but when can we start thinking?
AlphDoti
#24 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 12:32:06 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/20/2008
Posts: 6,275
Location: Kenya
Bigchick wrote:
When Orengo says 100+killed, ask him for evidence. When he says rigging ask for evidence? When he says go to the streets ask where are his kids and family in the line up. Only you can stop the madness.

As long as they stone cops then a bullet will fly back.

To see someone who claim to be enlightened talk like this know we're doomed.

Reporters arrested. Police block other journalists from covering protests. The you have the guts to ask for evidence? Are you serious when you ask that?

And FYI, before you ask, I am not a Luo. Why does it matter the tribe anyway. Tribalism in your heart again?
AlphDoti
#25 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 12:34:11 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/20/2008
Posts: 6,275
Location: Kenya
@Bigchick and the rest of the like...

The most crucial part of stealing/killing is to erase evidence that can incriminate you in court. But to God, our hearts, the evidence will not be erased.
Wakanyugi
#26 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 12:50:21 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,635
tycho wrote:
Nandwa wrote:
Mubebelezano uishe.
Let RAO be told the naked truth.
The people who are dying as a result of the ill advised chaotic protests are squarely due to him - RAO.

Why is it taboo to tell RAO the hard truth!


And what is this truth? That Raila lost 'fairly'? How much do we know about this?

Consider this other 'truth'. The courts are the best suited to determine the truth.

But what happens in instances where 'truth' threatens the status quo and the imminent change is deemed too costly, even by some of those who are to determine the truth?

I'd like to use the example of the ICC cases against the now president elect and his deputy. Considering the lobbying and jockeying that was evident, the ICC had to consider the threat to its existence and it's probable that this was an influence in how the court decided to deal with the cases.

The big question now is how we can negotiate truth in a pluralist society, and also how and whether this truth can be enforced or effected.

We lose it when we define the problem simply as, 'Raila'.



Sorry Tycho but you and I part ways here.

A true leader is known when things are going bad, not just when sycophants are massaging his ego.

If Raila can convince 6 million Kenyans to vote for him, he can convince a few misled youth not to die for him, as many of them are deluded into thinking. So far he has done no such thing. Granted he will lose face in doing so, but are the lives of our young people less important than his ego?

Our country will get now where if we can not hold those we apoint to lead us to account.
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
Mtu Biz
#27 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 12:58:13 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 1/16/2007
Posts: 1,320

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?




Sola Scriptura


majimaji
#28 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:02:14 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/4/2007
Posts: 1,162
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?






No. And that is why the man says the courts are not an option. In my view, he missed the ICC bus last time but this time round he is very insistent on boarding. Where is Bensouda when you need her?
Nandwa
#29 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:10:04 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/17/2009
Posts: 1,049
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?





'Njaa mingi' - 5yrs waitLaughing out loudly
You are not likely to hear any cogent rationale!
Its a nusu mkate zero game - dont introduce logic here!
Just as absolute power corrupts leaders, so does absolute fanaticism blind the people from logic
Bigchick
#30 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:12:32 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/8/2013
Posts: 4,068
Location: At Large.
AlphDoti wrote:
Bigchick wrote:
When Orengo says 100+killed, ask him for evidence. When he says rigging ask for evidence? When he says go to the streets ask where are his kids and family in the line up. Only you can stop the madness.

As long as they stone cops then a bullet will fly back.

To see someone who claim to be enlightened talk like this know we're doomed.

Reporters arrested. Police block other journalists from covering protests. The you have the guts to ask for evidence? Are you serious when you ask that?

And FYI, before you ask, I am not a Luo. Why does it matter the tribe anyway. Tribalism in your heart again?



So evidence is only from reporters and journalists.Evidence is required for us to get the truth.How come KNHRC have 24.

Please read the context with which the "Luo tribe question"came in.
Love is beautiful and so are those who share it.With Love, Marriage is an amazing event in ones life time, the foundation of joy, happiness and success.
tycho
#31 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:17:10 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Nandwa wrote:
Mubebelezano uishe.
Let RAO be told the naked truth.
The people who are dying as a result of the ill advised chaotic protests are squarely due to him - RAO.

Why is it taboo to tell RAO the hard truth!


And what is this truth? That Raila lost 'fairly'? How much do we know about this?

Consider this other 'truth'. The courts are the best suited to determine the truth.

But what happens in instances where 'truth' threatens the status quo and the imminent change is deemed too costly, even by some of those who are to determine the truth?

I'd like to use the example of the ICC cases against the now president elect and his deputy. Considering the lobbying and jockeying that was evident, the ICC had to consider the threat to its existence and it's probable that this was an influence in how the court decided to deal with the cases.

The big question now is how we can negotiate truth in a pluralist society, and also how and whether this truth can be enforced or effected.

We lose it when we define the problem simply as, 'Raila'.



Sorry Tycho but you and I part ways here.

A true leader is known when things are going bad, not just when sycophants are massaging his ego.

If Raila can convince 6 million Kenyans to vote for him, he can convince a few misled youth not to die for him, as many of them are deluded into thinking. So far he has done no such thing. Granted he will lose face in doing so, but are the lives of our young people less important than his ego?

Our country will get now where if we can not hold those we apoint to lead us to account.


From what you're saying I can imagine that at least one assumption you have is that 'All leaders are superior to whom they lead and that they are immune from influences of those they lead'.

Otherwise, if our assumption were the leaders are subject to influence and therefore can be scripted we'd be looking at this matter differently.

Pause for a moment and imagine: what really happens if Raila doesn't say anything but there's inherent injustice in our system and the only way out is an overhaul or revolution? So far that's the implicit message.

For me it's no longer about pressuring Raila to concede. As you've seen it goes deep into question of sanity, being. It's about making sense of day to day life experience.
Intelligentsia
#32 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:23:22 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/1/2009
Posts: 2,436
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?






Thank you, this is exactly what I really want to know as well.

The Law is very clear Forms 34A/B/C are sacrosanct in the tallying process - very telling that NASA agents have NOT raised any issues of discrepancy between what they signed off and submitted to IEBC and what IEBC used for tallying so far, otherwise they would be screaming it everywhere.

...all those pang'ang'as mara of Msando (may he RiP), inaccurate computer logs, faulty NASA tallies, some insider, demand for access to servers, etc are just red herrings, and am glad many folks including envoys have seen these shifting goal posts for what they truly are - struggling to accept a major routing.

Good most Kenyans can now see very clearly that all those electoral reforms they wanted (and were granted) were meant more to aid their quest for power than for Kenya. It appears crowds used to go more for the hype (all those tialala/ tibim chants) than any real belief in Baba.

Everyday that passes without conceding, Baba is losing any goodwill he may have acquired over the years and his democratic credentials increasingly appear to have been, in fact, a cover for naked greed for power.


tycho
#33 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:28:35 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?



Yes. It can be interrogated.

When there's a reference to 'the court of public opinion' then there's an invitation to interrogation.

By the way, any concerned citizen(s) can find a way via the courts.
Mtu Biz
#34 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:38:28 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 1/16/2007
Posts: 1,320
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?



Yes. It can be interrogated.

When there's a reference to 'the court of public opinion' then there's an invitation to interrogation.

By the way, any concerned citizen(s) can find a way via the courts.


If Yes,

Is it just or fair to ask that the originator of the assertion provide this basis ?
Sola Scriptura


Wakanyugi
#35 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:43:32 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,635
tycho wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Nandwa wrote:
Mubebelezano uishe.
Let RAO be told the naked truth.
The people who are dying as a result of the ill advised chaotic protests are squarely due to him - RAO.

Why is it taboo to tell RAO the hard truth!


And what is this truth? That Raila lost 'fairly'? How much do we know about this?

Consider this other 'truth'. The courts are the best suited to determine the truth.

But what happens in instances where 'truth' threatens the status quo and the imminent change is deemed too costly, even by some of those who are to determine the truth?

I'd like to use the example of the ICC cases against the now president elect and his deputy. Considering the lobbying and jockeying that was evident, the ICC had to consider the threat to its existence and it's probable that this was an influence in how the court decided to deal with the cases.

The big question now is how we can negotiate truth in a pluralist society, and also how and whether this truth can be enforced or effected.

We lose it when we define the problem simply as, 'Raila'.



Sorry Tycho but you and I part ways here.

A true leader is known when things are going bad, not just when sycophants are massaging his ego.

If Raila can convince 6 million Kenyans to vote for him, he can convince a few misled youth not to die for him, as many of them are deluded into thinking. So far he has done no such thing. Granted he will lose face in doing so, but are the lives of our young people less important than his ego?

Our country will get now where if we can not hold those we apoint to lead us to account.


From what you're saying I can imagine that at least one assumption you have is that 'All leaders are superior to whom they lead and that they are immune from influences of those they lead'.

Otherwise, if our assumption were the leaders are subject to influence and therefore can be scripted we'd be looking at this matter differently.

Pause for a moment and imagine: what really happens if Raila doesn't say anything but there's inherent injustice in our system and the only way out is an overhaul or revolution? So far that's the implicit message.

For me it's no longer about pressuring Raila to concede. As you've seen it goes deep into question of sanity, being. It's about making sense of day to day life experience.


'All leaders are superior to whom they lead and that they are immune from influences of those they lead'.

They don't have to be superior to the led, but they have to lead. And that means not just enjoying the perks of power but stepping up to the plate when things go south, sacrificing their ego, beliefs and comforts even, for the good of those who trusted them with leadership.

"Otherwise, if our assumption were the leaders are subject to influence and therefore can be scripted we'd be looking at this matter differently."

So Raila is no longer accountable for his actions, seeing as he has been scripted? Then why did he want to lead Kenya in the first place?

Look Tycho, scripted or not, Raila has the power to save lives today, at no more cost to him than loss of face. It seems he won't do it, either because to him those lives are expendable or some other warped reason.

And you want us to excuse such? Please


"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
tycho
#36 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 1:52:33 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Mtu Biz wrote:
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?



Yes. It can be interrogated.

When there's a reference to 'the court of public opinion' then there's an invitation to interrogation.

By the way, any concerned citizen(s) can find a way via the courts.


If Yes,

Is it just or fair to ask that the originator of the assertion provide this basis ?


It may be fair and just to ask the originator. And in fact, if the originator wishes to engender enlightened public opinion then he/they should engage their 'bloggers' for example.

But there's also a possibility that the originator isn't in a position to respond as we wish. Do we go for his jugular?
Mtu Biz
#37 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 2:02:32 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 1/16/2007
Posts: 1,320
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?



Yes. It can be interrogated.

When there's a reference to 'the court of public opinion' then there's an invitation to interrogation.

By the way, any concerned citizen(s) can find a way via the courts.


If Yes,

Is it just or fair to ask that the originator of the assertion provide this basis ?


It may be fair and just to ask the originator. And in fact, if the originator wishes to engender enlightened public opinion then he/they should engage their 'bloggers' for example.

But there's also a possibility that the originator isn't in a position to respond as we wish. Do we go for his jugular?



The response to this question need not be complex.

The election was stolen because....

1.
2.
3.

Is it just or fair to interrogate 1,2 and 3 as provided by the originator of this assertion ?






Sola Scriptura


tycho
#38 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 2:10:41 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Nandwa wrote:
Mubebelezano uishe.
Let RAO be told the naked truth.
The people who are dying as a result of the ill advised chaotic protests are squarely due to him - RAO.

Why is it taboo to tell RAO the hard truth!


And what is this truth? That Raila lost 'fairly'? How much do we know about this?

Consider this other 'truth'. The courts are the best suited to determine the truth.

But what happens in instances where 'truth' threatens the status quo and the imminent change is deemed too costly, even by some of those who are to determine the truth?

I'd like to use the example of the ICC cases against the now president elect and his deputy. Considering the lobbying and jockeying that was evident, the ICC had to consider the threat to its existence and it's probable that this was an influence in how the court decided to deal with the cases.

The big question now is how we can negotiate truth in a pluralist society, and also how and whether this truth can be enforced or effected.

We lose it when we define the problem simply as, 'Raila'.



Sorry Tycho but you and I part ways here.

A true leader is known when things are going bad, not just when sycophants are massaging his ego.

If Raila can convince 6 million Kenyans to vote for him, he can convince a few misled youth not to die for him, as many of them are deluded into thinking. So far he has done no such thing. Granted he will lose face in doing so, but are the lives of our young people less important than his ego?

Our country will get now where if we can not hold those we apoint to lead us to account.


From what you're saying I can imagine that at least one assumption you have is that 'All leaders are superior to whom they lead and that they are immune from influences of those they lead'.

Otherwise, if our assumption were the leaders are subject to influence and therefore can be scripted we'd be looking at this matter differently.

Pause for a moment and imagine: what really happens if Raila doesn't say anything but there's inherent injustice in our system and the only way out is an overhaul or revolution? So far that's the implicit message.

For me it's no longer about pressuring Raila to concede. As you've seen it goes deep into question of sanity, being. It's about making sense of day to day life experience.


'All leaders are superior to whom they lead and that they are immune from influences of those they lead'.

They don't have to be superior to the led, but they have to lead. And that means not just enjoying the perks of power but stepping up to the plate when things go south, sacrificing their ego, beliefs and comforts even, for the good of those who trusted them with leadership.

"Otherwise, if our assumption were the leaders are subject to influence and therefore can be scripted we'd be looking at this matter differently."

So Raila is no longer accountable for his actions, seeing as he has been scripted? Then why did he want to lead Kenya in the first place?

Look Tycho, scripted or not, Raila has the power to save lives today, at no more cost to him than loss of face. It seems he won't do it, either because to him those lives are expendable or some other warped reason.

And you want us to excuse such? Please




You know even the young people protesting believe your statement to be true? The only other addition, being that it's worth dying for the cause.

I live in Kibera myself, and I know for a fact that there are many young people who go to work, but are never paid as per their contracts. And they can't do anything about it because the police and the law have proven more often than not, to listen to the voice of money and power.

Contrast that with how the president and the deputy have lived and gotten to power, and the kind of system they seem to be propagating.

Then tell me if, from the young people's perspective, Raila isn't saving lives now and in the future by seeking a final thrust for change in the status quo. Raila may lose face by doing so. But what the heck!

Individuals bear responsibility even when acting their scripts, but the buck doesn't stop there.



Quote:

tycho
#39 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 2:12:15 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Mtu Biz wrote:
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?



Yes. It can be interrogated.

When there's a reference to 'the court of public opinion' then there's an invitation to interrogation.

By the way, any concerned citizen(s) can find a way via the courts.


If Yes,

Is it just or fair to ask that the originator of the assertion provide this basis ?


It may be fair and just to ask the originator. And in fact, if the originator wishes to engender enlightened public opinion then he/they should engage their 'bloggers' for example.

But there's also a possibility that the originator isn't in a position to respond as we wish. Do we go for his jugular?



The response to this question need not be complex.

The election was stolen because....

1.
2.
3.

Is it just or fair to interrogate 1,2 and 3 as provided by the originator of this assertion ?




The responses to these questions are never simple if we're serious about our lives.

Yes. It's just and fair to interrogate the responses as provided by the originator.
Mtu Biz
#40 Posted : Monday, August 14, 2017 2:23:03 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 1/16/2007
Posts: 1,320
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:
tycho wrote:
Mtu Biz wrote:

If we can all step back from reacting to each other's comments maybe some light can be shed for both the 'winners' and 'losers'.

Is it fair or just to ask.. on what is the assertion that 'the election was stolen' based on?

Can the basis of that assertion be interrogated?

Yes or No?



Yes. It can be interrogated.

When there's a reference to 'the court of public opinion' then there's an invitation to interrogation.

By the way, any concerned citizen(s) can find a way via the courts.


If Yes,

Is it just or fair to ask that the originator of the assertion provide this basis ?


It may be fair and just to ask the originator. And in fact, if the originator wishes to engender enlightened public opinion then he/they should engage their 'bloggers' for example.

But there's also a possibility that the originator isn't in a position to respond as we wish. Do we go for his jugular?



The response to this question need not be complex.

The election was stolen because....

1.
2.
3.

Is it just or fair to interrogate 1,2 and 3 as provided by the originator of this assertion ?




The responses to these questions are never simple if we're serious about our lives.

Yes. It's just and fair to interrogate the responses as provided by the originator.



Is the forum provided in our current laws, that offers a public platform for this interrogation of the basis of these assertions and offers determinations based on verifiable information provided, a fair and just forum ?

i.e Courts?
Sola Scriptura


Users browsing this topic
Guest
8 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.