hardwood wrote:tycho wrote:@Hardwood, how does my support for application of the law translate to holding the country 'at ransom'?
The law says no one should encroach on anyone's land including govt road reserves. It also says that no one should put up illegal/unapproved/unsanitary structures within the city or any other jurisdiction. You cannot purport to support an illegality. The law gives the land owner (in this case the govt) the right to develop/utilise his land in any way he deems fit. And to remove any illegal structures within their land.
In this case there are at least three reasons that would suffice to file a petition in court:
1. Contracts, rights and privileges, and exemptions to certain laws may be achieved implicitly and constructively
2. Correct interpretation of law isn't always straight forward
3. Certain interpretations of law may not optimal with respect to the welfare of the country
As such, if a party in any relationship may find such reasons to hold, then that party has right to seek legal redress. These conditions hold in this particular case and therefore my support is qualified.