McReggae wrote:mv_ufanisi wrote:There's something unethical and quite disturbing about this saga. An employee is not allowed to use company resources for self benefit. In the United States this would definitely not go down. Employees have atleast a 1 year non compete clause with their company. They are also barred from recruiting other employees from the same company to their new outfit for this same reason.
Britam can easily claim that ED and co stole company intellectual property and resources.
I'll be surprised if BRITAM doesn't sue.
Hakuna business ethics Kenya, there is no way you will continue counting billions over people's sweat as they watch! Compensate your employees well or prepare for such moments!
I think this is a case of unethical behavior by employees.
Didn't BRITAM have a clear company policy on a non-compete as well as intellectual property?
Shareholders are getting screwed as employees utilize company resources for self gain.
This deal with Acorn was done while said employees were acting as BRITAM agents and using BRITAM resources.
For them to turn around and turn it over to themselves is definitely unethical.
The CMA should launch an investigation as BRITAM shareholder interests have been compromised as well.