Wazua
»
Market
»
Review
»
How did we let Ariel overtake Omo
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/21/2008 Posts: 2,490
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 11/5/2010 Posts: 2,459
|
@zze123, bouncy has always been manufactured in China. I actually checked the packaging. Now if I have to choose between two imported products and one is from china. . . . .
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 11/5/2010 Posts: 2,459
|
2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:How could we ? How do you walk to a supermarket, choose a foreign brand over our homegrown guided by nothing else apart from an aggressive marketing campaign? Homegrown?? Most people believe that Omo is a local brand. Omo is as foreign as Ariel. Just because we used 504s for a long time doesn't mean we should not buy better more efficient Toyotas. Omo has failed somewhere hence the punishment by consumers. My defn of local is simply where the manufacturing plant is located. Hope the good people at Unilever can hear the complaints about quality. But for the love of our crawling economy, please buy sunlight not Ariel. I think it will be hard to move people from Ariel. If you go to the mtumba/2nd hand boutique sellers they all tell you they use Arial because it cleans and brightens at the same time. That's a big market and they are the reason why Arial is up there. Now ask the mamas who go around estates washing clothes for bachelors especially. Guys buy what they are told and those mamas recommend Ariel. It's sad that Kenyans may lose jobs but these are the consequences that come with the global market. Another brand in foreseeable danger is Tusker. The brand is not growing but Heineken is experiencing massive growth in consumer numbers. @2012, what you have said is so true yet so scary. And clearly, there are not many Kenyans who give a damn about local brands.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/30/2008 Posts: 6,029
|
quicksand wrote:kysse wrote:Omo can continue sitting pretty on the shelves because it burns hands.
If you want to beat the competition,please beat their standard.
Sunlight/Ariel anytime. Burns hands? Never noticed. If you ask me I would tell you that is a concept that was sneaked into people's minds by devious marketing minds and then it stuck and became a yardstick. There is another, colgate triple action I think,..or Jameson's double distilled. You imagine it, therefore it becomes real. If you asked somebody who has never been exposed to advertising to compare and contrast the 2 the concept of 'burnt hands' wouldn't come up. Probably. It burns hands and I experienced it firsthand at the back of my fingers.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/21/2013 Posts: 2,841 Location: Here
|
mawinder wrote:quicksand wrote:kysse wrote:Omo can continue sitting pretty on the shelves because it burns hands.
If you want to beat the competition,please beat their standard.
Sunlight/Ariel anytime. Burns hands? Never noticed. If you ask me I would tell you that is a concept that was sneaked into people's minds by devious marketing minds and then it stuck and became a yardstick. There is another, colgate triple action I think,..or Jameson's double distilled. You imagine it, therefore it becomes real. If you asked somebody who has never been exposed to advertising to compare and contrast the 2 the concept of 'burnt hands' wouldn't come up. Probably. It burns hands and I experienced it firsthand at the back of my fingers. Same here. Some time last year after using it, the skin on my fingers literally peeled off. Kuwashwa nayo? Life is like playing a violin solo in public and learning the instrument as one goes on.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 1/17/2013 Posts: 4,693 Location: Earth
|
We have enough witness accounts to make them improve the brand.I am stuck to Ariel.
The worst omo is the coloured one,causes the skin to chip after use.It's like acid.
Don't they ever do tests on real humans like Johnsons,Gillette etc etc?
They should know that we consumers are more interested in performance and not Brand after all Brand imo is for company's profits while performance is the consumer's ultimate choice.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/21/2013 Posts: 2,841 Location: Here
|
kysse wrote:We have enough witness accounts to make them improve the brand.I am stuck to Ariel.
The worst omo is the coloured one,causes the skin to chip after use.It's like acid.
Don't they ever do tests on real humans like Johnsons,Gillette etc etc?
They should know that we consumers are more interested in performance and not Brand after all Brand imo is for company's profits while performance is the consumer's ultimate choice. I recall reading that some (all?) detergents contain enzymes to 'digest' dirt, especially that which is of protein nature. Problem is, the skin is also protein and is 'digestible' too and therefore an intricate balance is required. Hii ya Omo seems like they overdid it. Life is like playing a violin solo in public and learning the instrument as one goes on.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/1/2010 Posts: 3,024 Location: Hapa
|
jaggernaut wrote:How is Toss? i use toss, no complaints and i believe it is home grown unless evidenced is adduced to the contrary. i believe in buy kenya build kenya but on the other hand quality of local products should be good Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. - Muhammad Ali🐝
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 1/17/2013 Posts: 4,693 Location: Earth
|
Rankaz13 wrote:kysse wrote:We have enough witness accounts to make them improve the brand.I am stuck to Ariel.
The worst omo is the coloured one,causes the skin to chip after use.It's like acid.
Don't they ever do tests on real humans like Johnsons,Gillette etc etc?
They should know that we consumers are more interested in performance and not Brand after all Brand imo is for company's profits while performance is the consumer's ultimate choice. I recall reading that some (all?) detergents contain enzymes to 'digest' dirt, especially that which is of protein nature. Problem is, the skin is also protein and is 'digestible' too and therefore an intricate balance is required. Hii ya Omo seems like they overdid it. See,from Detergent to Carnivore! Kwani they test it on elephants after manufacture? Now, should we allow ourselves to be eaten by omo so as to promote the local industry? Shows they don't care about our health.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2007 Posts: 8,776 Location: Cameroon
|
2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:How could we ? How do you walk to a supermarket, choose a foreign brand over our homegrown guided by nothing else apart from an aggressive marketing campaign? Homegrown?? Most people believe that Omo is a local brand. Omo is as foreign as Ariel. Just because we used 504s for a long time doesn't mean we should not buy better more efficient Toyotas. Omo has failed somewhere hence the punishment by consumers. My defn of local is simply where the manufacturing plant is located. Hope the good people at Unilever can hear the complaints about quality. But for the love of our crawling economy, please buy sunlight not Ariel. I think it will be hard to move people from Ariel. If you go to the mtumba/2nd hand boutique sellers they all tell you they use Arial because it cleans and brightens at the same time. That's a big market and they are the reason why Arial is up there. Now ask the mamas who go around estates washing clothes for bachelors especially. Guys buy what they are told and those mamas recommend Ariel. It's sad that Kenyans may lose jobs but these are the consequences that come with the global market. Another brand in foreseeable danger is Tusker. The brand is not growing but Heineken is experiencing massive growth in consumer numbers. Tusker is not in ANY danger so long as thimioni is roaming the earth! Kindly. .. TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/20/2009 Posts: 1,402
|
kysse wrote:Rankaz13 wrote:kysse wrote:We have enough witness accounts to make them improve the brand.I am stuck to Ariel.
The worst omo is the coloured one,causes the skin to chip after use.It's like acid.
Don't they ever do tests on real humans like Johnsons,Gillette etc etc?
They should know that we consumers are more interested in performance and not Brand after all Brand imo is for company's profits while performance is the consumer's ultimate choice. I recall reading that some (all?) detergents contain enzymes to 'digest' dirt, especially that which is of protein nature. Problem is, the skin is also protein and is 'digestible' too and therefore an intricate balance is required. Hii ya Omo seems like they overdid it. See,from Detergent to Carnivore! Kwani they test it on elephants after manufacture? Now, should we allow ourselves to be eaten by omo so as to promote the local industry? Shows they don't care about our health. The day the house manager came into the living room, hands out and said " E,...angalia venye omo imeharibu mkono yangu....please buy Toss..." n Toss it has been.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
Omo, sunlight Ariel are all foreign, if you are serious about keeping jobs in Kenya then buy toss and what Bidco makes panga soap. And yes Omo burns "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore .
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/9/2009 Posts: 6,592 Location: Nairobi
|
simonkabz wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:How could we ? How do you walk to a supermarket, choose a foreign brand over our homegrown guided by nothing else apart from an aggressive marketing campaign? Homegrown?? Most people believe that Omo is a local brand. Omo is as foreign as Ariel. Just because we used 504s for a long time doesn't mean we should not buy better more efficient Toyotas. Omo has failed somewhere hence the punishment by consumers. My defn of local is simply where the manufacturing plant is located. Hope the good people at Unilever can hear the complaints about quality. But for the love of our crawling economy, please buy sunlight not Ariel. I think it will be hard to move people from Ariel. If you go to the mtumba/2nd hand boutique sellers they all tell you they use Arial because it cleans and brightens at the same time. That's a big market and they are the reason why Arial is up there. Now ask the mamas who go around estates washing clothes for bachelors especially. Guys buy what they are told and those mamas recommend Ariel. It's sad that Kenyans may lose jobs but these are the consequences that come with the global market. Another brand in foreseeable danger is Tusker. The brand is not growing but Heineken is experiencing massive growth in consumer numbers. Tusker is not in ANY danger so long as thimioni is roaming the earth! Kindly. .. Believe me @Simon, Tusker is not in a good place. They might not kill the brand because of it's heritage but in the next 10 years it will not be a cash cow for eabl unless they pull out some miracle. Here are the few things that are giving Tusker headaches: • Heineken • Keroche • Castle • Not recruiting good numbers - The young upcoming consumer is not driven by patriotism but by status, association and quality. 21yr olds look at Tusker as a beer for their parents. • Mututho • Eabl's bigger focus on Diageo brands than local. BBI will solve it :)
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 4/2/2011 Posts: 629 Location: Nai
|
2012 wrote:simonkabz wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:How could we ? How do you walk to a supermarket, choose a foreign brand over our homegrown guided by nothing else apart from an aggressive marketing campaign? Homegrown?? Most people believe that Omo is a local brand. Omo is as foreign as Ariel. Just because we used 504s for a long time doesn't mean we should not buy better more efficient Toyotas. Omo has failed somewhere hence the punishment by consumers. My defn of local is simply where the manufacturing plant is located. Hope the good people at Unilever can hear the complaints about quality. But for the love of our crawling economy, please buy sunlight not Ariel. I think it will be hard to move people from Ariel. If you go to the mtumba/2nd hand boutique sellers they all tell you they use Arial because it cleans and brightens at the same time. That's a big market and they are the reason why Arial is up there. Now ask the mamas who go around estates washing clothes for bachelors especially. Guys buy what they are told and those mamas recommend Ariel. It's sad that Kenyans may lose jobs but these are the consequences that come with the global market. Another brand in foreseeable danger is Tusker. The brand is not growing but Heineken is experiencing massive growth in consumer numbers. Tusker is not in ANY danger so long as thimioni is roaming the earth! Kindly. .. Believe me @Simon, Tusker is not in a good place. They might not kill the brand because of it's heritage but in the next 10 years it will not be a cash cow for eabl unless they pull out some miracle. Here are the few things that are giving Tusker headaches: • Heineken • Keroche • Castle • Not recruiting good numbers - The young upcoming consumer is not driven by patriotism but by status, association and quality. 21yr olds look at Tusker as a beer for their parents. • Mututho • Eabl's bigger focus on Diageo brands than local. Yes in fact with a little increase in their marketing budget, Keroche's summit and summit malt will replace tusker and tusker malt respectively in a few years. Those who partake of Jeremiah's waters should sample the summit brand vis a vis EABL brands and come back to this forum with their feedback
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 4/2/2011 Posts: 629 Location: Nai
|
2012 wrote:simonkabz wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:2012 wrote:FRM2011 wrote:How could we ? How do you walk to a supermarket, choose a foreign brand over our homegrown guided by nothing else apart from an aggressive marketing campaign? Homegrown?? Most people believe that Omo is a local brand. Omo is as foreign as Ariel. Just because we used 504s for a long time doesn't mean we should not buy better more efficient Toyotas. Omo has failed somewhere hence the punishment by consumers. My defn of local is simply where the manufacturing plant is located. Hope the good people at Unilever can hear the complaints about quality. But for the love of our crawling economy, please buy sunlight not Ariel. I think it will be hard to move people from Ariel. If you go to the mtumba/2nd hand boutique sellers they all tell you they use Arial because it cleans and brightens at the same time. That's a big market and they are the reason why Arial is up there. Now ask the mamas who go around estates washing clothes for bachelors especially. Guys buy what they are told and those mamas recommend Ariel. It's sad that Kenyans may lose jobs but these are the consequences that come with the global market. Another brand in foreseeable danger is Tusker. The brand is not growing but Heineken is experiencing massive growth in consumer numbers. Tusker is not in ANY danger so long as thimioni is roaming the earth! Kindly. .. Believe me @Simon, Tusker is not in a good place. They might not kill the brand because of it's heritage but in the next 10 years it will not be a cash cow for eabl unless they pull out some miracle. Here are the few things that are giving Tusker headaches: • Heineken • Keroche • Castle • Not recruiting good numbers - The young upcoming consumer is not driven by patriotism but by status, association and quality. 21yr olds look at Tusker as a beer for their parents. • Mututho • Eabl's bigger focus on Diageo brands than local. Yes in fact with a little increase in their marketing budget, Keroche's summit and summit malt will replace tusker and tusker malt respectively in a few years. Those who partake of Jeremiah's waters should sample the summit brand vis a vis EABL brands and come back to this forum with their feedback
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 1/27/2012 Posts: 851 Location: Nairobi
|
2012 wrote: • Not recruiting good numbers - The young upcoming consumer is not driven by patriotism but by status, association and quality. 21yr olds look at Tusker as a beer for their parents.
The youth of Holland, what are they drinking in the name of "status,association and quality"? If just like their Kenyan counterparts, they would be seeing Heineken as a 'beer for their parents'. Ujinga itaua nyeuthi!
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
FRM2011 wrote:The latest market share research indicates Ariel is the top detergent brand in kenya.
How could we ? How do you walk to a supermarket, choose a foreign brand over our homegrown guided by nothing else apart from an aggressive marketing campaign ? Are we really that cheap and easy to confuse, sorry, convince.
Then sit down and complain about youth unemployment ! ! !
Its basic economics. There is a wazuan who had a beautiful tagline about producing what you consume and consuming what we produce.
In my household, the only imported brand allowed is pampers.
When reckitt closed their Kenyan operations, I dropped their brands I.e. dettol, jik and harpic. Even the fact that they outsource some of the manufacturing locally to orion chemicals was not good enough for me. Roberts and ace were my natural choices.
Damn Kenyans and their poor choices. Eti nini hiyo? SMH!!!! Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
mawinder wrote:quicksand wrote:kysse wrote:Omo can continue sitting pretty on the shelves because it burns hands.
If you want to beat the competition,please beat their standard.
Sunlight/Ariel anytime. Burns hands? Never noticed. If you ask me I would tell you that is a concept that was sneaked into people's minds by devious marketing minds and then it stuck and became a yardstick. There is another, colgate triple action I think,..or Jameson's double distilled. You imagine it, therefore it becomes real. If you asked somebody who has never been exposed to advertising to compare and contrast the 2 the concept of 'burnt hands' wouldn't come up. Probably. It burns hands and I experienced it firsthand at the back of my fingers. You can manage to hire people to "murder" wealthy and powerful individuals yet you cant afford to hire mama mboga to wash your clothes! SMH. Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/30/2008 Posts: 6,029
|
Impunity wrote:mawinder wrote:quicksand wrote:kysse wrote:Omo can continue sitting pretty on the shelves because it burns hands.
If you want to beat the competition,please beat their standard.
Sunlight/Ariel anytime. Burns hands? Never noticed. If you ask me I would tell you that is a concept that was sneaked into people's minds by devious marketing minds and then it stuck and became a yardstick. There is another, colgate triple action I think,..or Jameson's double distilled. You imagine it, therefore it becomes real. If you asked somebody who has never been exposed to advertising to compare and contrast the 2 the concept of 'burnt hands' wouldn't come up. Probably. It burns hands and I experienced it firsthand at the back of my fingers. You can manage to hire people to "murder" wealthy and powerful individuals yet you cant afford to hire mama mboga to wash your clothes! SMH. Link please.Anyway there are some clothes that I wash personally.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
mkeiy wrote:2012 wrote: • Not recruiting good numbers - The young upcoming consumer is not driven by patriotism but by status, association and quality. 21yr olds look at Tusker as a beer for their parents.
The youth of Holland, what are they drinking in the name of "status,association and quality"? If just like their Kenyan counterparts, they would be seeing Heineken as a 'beer for their parents'. Ujinga itaua nyeuthi! Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Wazua
»
Market
»
Review
»
How did we let Ariel overtake Omo
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|