people change when they appear before a court of law, reporting and writing statement to and with the police is the easy part - defending your statement is another issue

The burden of proof will lie on ICC. They must demonstrate that UHURUTO have interfered with the witnesses. That would be the real job...

...truth be told that meeting never happened rather kibaki dint meet mungiki youth as claimed but youth leaders from.various parts of the country,hapo kusema ukweli ocampo goofed,as I said earlier mtu mwenye shida ni WSR there is so much against him and he knows that

ati he lives where?trust wazuans to code sensitive messages enyewe Mzalendo Kibunja and co have a hard time.

[quote=yekeyeke]For those who may not have seen Witness number four recant evidence given, see link below.
Without witness number four, there was no mungiki meeting at state house and therefore the confirmation decision was based on a false witness.

To Avoid miscarriage of Justice, the case should be refereed back to the pre-trial chamber to be looked at afresh.
As i had stated earlier, this case is DEAD ON ARRIVAL. Ocampo was one big politician, playing to the tune of the west to fix Africa back to colonial times.



http://africanpress.me/2...osecutor-moreno-ocampo/[/quote]

.....more than 30 witnesses are lined up aganst UMK.....not only the famous paid up number 4!!!!!