Layman wrote:
By all standards I think CIC Insurance is a better investment than UAP, unless they (UAP) have been doctoring their accounts coz they dont look better as such. The only problem with CIC or the mistake that CIC made was that they created too many shares (3 billion of them hence the suppressed share price.
Which standards are you talking about?
>UAP insurance business is doing better that CICs (Check their underwriting profits)
>UAP has a far better investment portfolio than the bills/bonds/FDRs of CIC
>UAP is has a regional footprint, CIC does not
*The metric i see CIC beating UAP is on ownership (I dont like Kirubi and Centum who are top shareholders in UAP)