@Kihangeri,
Without even touching the ICC issue, I thought for a moment of going after you but I realized you're probably a broke, bitter dillusional person. But I want to let you know that what you strongly believe in could actually bring you down.

I will give you an example of Joshua Sang, I am a Kalenjin and like any other Kalenjin I listen and follow Kass FM. Before ICC went after Mr Sang a number people had warned him about his insensitive remarks on KASS FM, people would write private facebook messages to Mr Sang and he would in turn go on air and call these people fimbo ya mbali(in kale) because most of them were in Diaspora and were warning him on legal interpratation of his remarks.

So Mr Kihangeri, I understand the law very well and I want to give you a heads up, you can hate a court as much as you want to but you much construct your words very well otherwise your words can be used against you. Secondly Wazua is a big platform so this place can turn you from a small fish to a big fish without increasing the size of your wallet.

I will also want to give you a good advise, everyone knows you hate the west, I don't think you can sell that any more than you've already sold it, people who will buy what you say are people who think like you do and I think you have those people on your side already, for people like me and I guess other here, the more you push that agenda the more you look like an idiot.

I believe in an open society where everything is laid bare for all to see and make a judgement as opposed to just a few.

I have seen most of these emails in popular Kenyan forums and blogs which are available on Google .

They have been subjected to debate and its up to the viewers to either support of reject the witnesses based on the leaked emails.

There is no point in scaring anyone that they would be jailed for giving truthful information.

Only the most cowardly will fall for such a threat.

The Kinshasa government has its share of responsibility, having very cleverly used the ICC for its own political expediencies by turning its enemies over to the Court while shielding its friends from international prosecution. But to understand how what was one of the most fertile grounds for international justice in modern times was squandered so quickly, one must turn to the actions of the Court’s own prosecutor and the succession of faux pas and ill-advised decisions he took in the course of the investigation into the Lubanga case.

In the communiqué announcing the opening of the investigation, the prosecutor highlighted the fact that his office would focus its investigation so as to target “serious crimes” committed in the DRC territory from 1 July 2002 and only those “people that bore the highest responsibility” for the crimes.10

In the following months, however, the exact opposite happened. At the end of what appeared to be only a cursory investigation, the Court indicted people hardly thought of as bearing the highest responsibility for crimes that were not among the most serious committed in Ituri.

For most Congolese, Thomas Lubanga did not fit into the category of persons bearing “the greatest responsibility” for the crimes committed during the second phase of the Congolese war.