wazua Tue, Nov 26, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

2 Pages<12
In the beginning...
mukiha
#21 Posted : Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:47:00 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/27/2008
Posts: 4,114
I never thought SK could come to this. Astro-quatum-relativity.........!!!!!!!!

Now which way is SCOM going today?!

Behind the gardens...Behind the wall...Under the tree (Including: Red...Dark Blue...Yellow)
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
Fundaah
#22 Posted : Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:54:00 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 11/19/2008
Posts: 1,267
mukiha,its just a pass time,can't remember when I last checked the prices up there.....


I mean fundamental analysis,you get me?

Fundamental analysis of a business involves analyzing its financial statements and health,its management and competitive advantages,and its competitors
Isaiah 65:17-Look! I am creating new heavens and a new earth, and no one will even think about the old ones anymore
the sage
#23 Posted : Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:11:00 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 11/20/2008
Posts: 367
Hi Lo and all interested in the cosmos and similar topics please read:

A short history of nearly everything - Bill Bryson. Really good book about evolution,from the Big Bang to where we are today.
Kaigangio
#24 Posted : Wednesday, May 27, 2009 1:52:00 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 2/27/2007
Posts: 2,768
@ daimyo,

yes it is true that the skies above are full of stars and yet the earth's face on the opposite side of the sun's illumination is dark....the reason is that the stars are extremely far and the amount of light as measured at a given point from the stars is diminished. note that the nearest star to our planet earth is 41,200bilion kilometres (41,200,000billion metres) away.

For illustration purposes,when light is propagated from a source,its intensity or lumens level is inversely proportional to the square of distance (in metres) from the source. therefore the amount of light from say the closest star will be reduced by a factor (41,200,000billion metres) x (41,200,000billion metres). the resultant figure is too small (0 lux) to add any value to the overall illumination on the earth's surface. So if this is the case from the closest star how about the rest of the stars which are much further away?

it therefore follows that the only body which can illuminate the earth satisfactorily is the moon which on a celestrial scale is an arms length away from the earth's surface....



NEVER TALK OF A RHINO IF THERE IS NO TREE NEAREBY - ZULU PROVERB
...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.