ecstacy wrote:Insurgent wrote:If any one disagrees on any line of the article above, point it out we debate the same. otherwise, the article is well balance. Managu managu should write one for kibaki to balance the equation.
I agree with Insurgent.
If anyone questions the facts as stated, pls highlight it for discussion instead of resorting to playing victim - 'my man is being attacked'. The man is as depicted.
Disclaimer: First and foremost, let it be known that i am not necessarily an RAO supporter but i also am not a blind supporter to his opponents.
This i will direct specifically to @ecstacy and Insurgent because you requested for it but anyone else with something tangible is welcome not just hot air.....
is there any evidence that you can give us to indicate that RAO in whichever way connived with ICC to have the names of the suspects? Who gave the names? I thought these were the names from the Waki Commission that were handed over to Koffi Annan and the envelop was never opened? At what point were these names debated, inserted and sneaked them in? How come all the names came in as a shocker? such things cant go at that level without being noticed by anyone.... who has the waki report and is it available to public? then you can deduce how the names appeared. if they are adversely mentioned in the report, you surely expect them to be there. Remember the names were i think 12 but were reduced based on the magnitude of the 'evidence' the court had.
Give me the evidence or anything that can give us some concrete reason to believe RAO is actually behind the selection of the names and he actually schemed to have these names mentioned and i will believe with you that RAO is not a devil reincarnate, he is the devil himself!