Politics update Tue 26-Mar-13 - Page 18 - Politics - Wazua

Welcome Guest

Wazua » Club SK » Politics » Politics update Tue 26-Mar-13

20 Pages«<1617181920>

Politics update Tue 26-Mar-13

Options

Previous Topic · Next Topic

heavenly body		#171 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:13:16 PM
Rank: Member Joined: 7/31/2007 Posts: 146		Elder wrote: Rahatupu wrote: 900 page CORD affidavits on the way....... out........ pap.... Gone Were these the affidavits supporting the main Petition or the one filed Monday seeking God knows what?...am totally lost
Back to top		\|
User Profile

maka		#172 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:14:25 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/22/2010 Posts: 11,522 Location: Nairobi		dunkang wrote: so, does the 900 page affidavit rejection mean the 122 new polling stations are gone with the wind. nope... possunt quia posse videntur
Back to top		\|
User Profile

muganda		#173 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:15:17 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/15/2006 Posts: 3,908		maka wrote: murchr wrote: If you havent noted, his submissions hold so much weight that those of Oraro and co hold no water. What am simply saying is that the man knows the law and he's out to defend it tooth to nail. ok you have been heard @maka I myself had given a score of 7/10 to Ahmednasir, because he carries sway - the judges appear to listen to him. I'd not go as far as @murchr. Ahmednasir's submissions or knowledge is not very different from his co-counsels. I only find he stands out in his manner and directness. Counsel Ngatia for example, though a bit long winded, makes very logical arguments - his submissions stand out where I'm concerned.
Back to top		\| \| Edit by user: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:16 PM \| Reason: Not specified
User Profile

washiku		#174 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:18:43 PM
Rank: Chief Joined: 5/9/2007 Posts: 13,095		IMHO, that re-tallying process ongoing might be the main determinant of this case. All these other arguments and counter-arguments do not really add much value. A needy child's education depends on you. Click here to assist
Back to top		\|
User Profile

kingfisher		#175 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:19:55 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/9/2008 Posts: 2,824		The Elections Act No.24 of 2011 Section 44. The Commission may use such technology as it considers appropriate in the electoral process. what does that mean in view of failed technology??? When I have money, I get rid of it quickly, lest it find a way into my heart.
Back to top		\|
User Profile

masukuma		#176 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:21:06 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi		muganda wrote: So Supreme Court rules against Petitioners score so far nil - 3 Good so far! masukuma wrote: it was not fair to ambush people like that... the truth is the case has been changing from when Raila raised his request first. Ndwiwa... 1.5 million votes, 5.7 m to 4.5m votes e.t.c. At risk of sparking a world war @masukuma, you do realise if it is impossible to see any good in either party, then even a court case is pointless. The judges only rule after weighing merits of both sides, meaning each side must have some point. indeed... All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
Back to top		\|
User Profile

kingfisher		#177 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:21:53 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/9/2008 Posts: 2,824		washiku wrote: IMHO, that re-tallying process ongoing might be the main determinant of this case. All these other arguments and counter-arguments do not really add much value. i agree with you. it is the numbers which will make or break in this petition... all these other sideshows are like the flower girls. When I have money, I get rid of it quickly, lest it find a way into my heart.
Back to top		\|
User Profile

heavenly body		#178 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:22:04 PM
Rank: Member Joined: 7/31/2007 Posts: 146		washiku wrote: IMHO, that re-tallying process ongoing might be the main determinant of this case. All these other arguments and counter-arguments do not really add much value. Wait a minute - is the re-tallying process ordered yesterday to be done manually or electronically? If manually, then what does it say for IEBC's argument that electronic tallying is only for purposes of enhancement and not mandatory?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

kiriita		#179 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:28:29 PM
Rank: Member Joined: 4/20/2008 Posts: 437		Whereas the preliminary rulings have gone against the petitioners, most of the subject applications were sideshows - neither side has won/lost in real terms. Am in fact convinced that the forensic audit application was a red herring. The only real substantive orders so far - the scrutiny/retallying etc orders read by Smokin yesterday. This is the crux of the matter and is a double edged sword...
Back to top		\|
User Profile

dunkang		#180 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 5:35:45 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/2/2011 Posts: 4,824 Location: -1.2107, 36.8831		kingfisher wrote: The Elections Act No.24 of 2011 Section 44. The Commission may use such technology as it considers appropriate in the electoral process. what does that mean in view of failed technology??? i think the key word is 'MAY' and not 'MUST'. Receive with simplicity everything that happens to you.” ― Rashi
Back to top		\|
User Profile

20 Pages«<1617181920>

Wazua » Club SK » Politics » Politics update Tue 26-Mar-13

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Watch this topic
Print this topic

Normal
Threaded