Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
Anti_Burglar wrote:Ngalaka wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:AlphDoti wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote: Sometimes the things this superpower does .......... this one has no defense no matter how one tries to spin it. Why paint your F/A-18 Hornets to look like your adversary's Sukhoi Su-35? Are you up to some mischief in Syria? Do you want Alphdoti to regale us with more false flag stories........Some of us saw through Americas supposed veil of virginity and found whoredoms.  @burglar, I've not studied this subject of "false flag" i.e. painting your get away car to look like your that of your enemy  Air force's have over decades been simulating & even conducting aerial trainings & manoeuvres (sorties/ dogfights) using enemy aircraft to assess performance of the enemy's craft as well as their own against the same aircraft. Even using their paint schemes is fair game. 1) The Hornet here is the 'aggressor' fighter (simulates a 'bogey'/ 'bandit'- hostile and unidentified aircrafts), used for training purposes. 2) This appears a 2014 or so vid, not Syrian theatre, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QunNlF7-BUE
Or could be Uncle Sam is terrified (justifiably so) of the lethal, very formidable and very highly capable Russian S-400 missile SAM (can shoot any flying object - even one as small as a football travelling at supersonic speed). Oh, Intelligentsia, who needs to repaint planes for "training"? USAF? The greatest airforce in the world? These are not WW2 planes. They have all sorts of cutting edge electronics to identify friend and foe (IFF systems) which enables the super clever pilots to fight at night, in bad weather and even . . . . in zero visibility. Surely. trying to explain this away is comical. Remember the vial of white powder brandished in the UN Assembly that could be and was to be launched in 45 minutes ........ Doesnt that same argument nip your original assertion - that merely painting your fighters in somebody else's colours can be used as cover - in the age of today's technology! Can that fool any of the powers out there! Are you talking to me? Surely your comment is meant for Intelligence. Anyway, I intimated when dragging in Alphdoti that these newly painted Hornets are meant to be seen at the appropriate time and place. Maybe so that the appropriate blame can be put on the real owners of planes that had such a colour (after all such coloured planes "seen" flying overhead - by "distressed women and children" perhaps) and by the time world citizens realize the truth of the planes, another Shock and Awe has been achieved and there is pretty much nothing more to be done. Just like the vial. Clearly, @Intelligentsia missed the point
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/1/2009 Posts: 2,436
|
Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:Air force's have over decades been simulating & even conducting aerial trainings & manoeuvres (sorties/ dogfights) using enemy aircraft to assess performance of the enemy's craft as well as their own against the same aircraft. Even using their paint schemes is fair game. 1) The Hornet here is the 'aggressor' fighter (simulates a 'bogey'/ 'bandit'- hostile and unidentified aircrafts), used for training purposes. 2) This appears a 2014 or so vid, not Syrian theatre, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QunNlF7-BUE
Or could be Uncle Sam is terrified (justifiably so) of the lethal, very formidable and very highly capable Russian S-400 missile SAM (can shoot any flying object - even one as small as a football travelling at supersonic speed). Oh, Intelligentsia, who needs to repaint planes for "training"? USAF? The greatest airforce in the world? YES, USAF. Click here These are not WW2 planes. They have all sorts of cutting edge electronics to identify friend and foe (IFF systems) which enables the super clever pilots to fight at night, in bad weather and even . . . . in zero visibility. Surely. trying to explain this away is comical. Remember the vial of white powder brandished in the UN Assembly that could be and was to be launched in 45 minutes ........ I know about use of IFF systems, its what identifies a 'friendly' from a 'bandit' far away even before the pilots have visual contact with each other - a key consideration before launching Beyond-Visual-Range missiles. Aggressor aircraft can and do carry paint schemes of enemy craft to simulate enemy 'bandit's.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
Intelligentsia wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:Air force's have over decades been simulating & even conducting aerial trainings & manoeuvres (sorties/ dogfights) using enemy aircraft to assess performance of the enemy's craft as well as their own against the same aircraft. Even using their paint schemes is fair game. 1) The Hornet here is the 'aggressor' fighter (simulates a 'bogey'/ 'bandit'- hostile and unidentified aircrafts), used for training purposes. 2) This appears a 2014 or so vid, not Syrian theatre, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QunNlF7-BUE
Or could be Uncle Sam is terrified (justifiably so) of the lethal, very formidable and very highly capable Russian S-400 missile SAM (can shoot any flying object - even one as small as a football travelling at supersonic speed). Oh, Intelligentsia, who needs to repaint planes for "training"? USAF? The greatest airforce in the world? YES, USAF. Click here These are not WW2 planes. They have all sorts of cutting edge electronics to identify friend and foe (IFF systems) which enables the super clever pilots to fight at night, in bad weather and even . . . . in zero visibility. Surely. trying to explain this away is comical. Remember the vial of white powder brandished in the UN Assembly that could be and was to be launched in 45 minutes ........ I know about use of IFF systems, its what identifies a 'friendly' from a 'bandit' far away even before the pilots have visual contact with each other - a key consideration before launching Beyond-Visual-Range missiles. Aggressor aircraft can and do carry paint schemes of enemy craft to simulate enemy 'bandit's. Do US soldiers wear Ruskies uniforms when doing drills with NATO partners when simulating the enemy bandits? Wacha hiyo story yako. It is not meant for adults. I will not be taken in by it, maybe someone else will have that wool pulled over their eyes but not me and I think many other war-weary world citizens too.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 1/30/2016 Posts: 332 Location: Rift Valley
|
Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:Air force's have over decades been simulating & even conducting aerial trainings & manoeuvres (sorties/ dogfights) using enemy aircraft to assess performance of the enemy's craft as well as their own against the same aircraft. Even using their paint schemes is fair game. 1) The Hornet here is the 'aggressor' fighter (simulates a 'bogey'/ 'bandit'- hostile and unidentified aircrafts), used for training purposes. 2) This appears a 2014 or so vid, not Syrian theatre, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QunNlF7-BUE
Or could be Uncle Sam is terrified (justifiably so) of the lethal, very formidable and very highly capable Russian S-400 missile SAM (can shoot any flying object - even one as small as a football travelling at supersonic speed). Oh, Intelligentsia, who needs to repaint planes for "training"? USAF? The greatest airforce in the world? YES, USAF. Click here These are not WW2 planes. They have all sorts of cutting edge electronics to identify friend and foe (IFF systems) which enables the super clever pilots to fight at night, in bad weather and even . . . . in zero visibility. Surely. trying to explain this away is comical. Remember the vial of white powder brandished in the UN Assembly that could be and was to be launched in 45 minutes ........ I know about use of IFF systems, its what identifies a 'friendly' from a 'bandit' far away even before the pilots have visual contact with each other - a key consideration before launching Beyond-Visual-Range missiles. Aggressor aircraft can and do carry paint schemes of enemy craft to simulate enemy 'bandit's. Do US soldiers wear Ruskies uniforms when doing drills with NATO partners when simulating the enemy bandits? Wacha hiyo story yako. It is not meant for adults. I will not be taken in by it, maybe someone else will have that wool pulled over their eyes but not me and I think many other war-weary world citizens too. Stop mixing issues here. For training exercises the US Airforce has been repainting jets in enemy colours since the days of the Cold War. There are so many photos over the years of US jets with Iranian, Arab and Soviet/ Russian colour schemes.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/19/2011 Posts: 1,694
|
Do you agree with this statement from that book? Quote:A crusade? Crusades were Catholic holy wars fought during the Dark
Ages against Moslem hordes who refused to relinquish Jerusalem to the
pope. What does George Bush mean by a crusade? Alberto Rivera, an
ex-Jesuit priest, in his crusader series, has made it clear that the
Vatican created Islam to destroy Christians and Jews, protect Roman
Catholics, and to capture Jerusalem for the pope. For the first few
hundred years of their existence, Islam did just that. When it came
time for the powerful generals of the Islamic armies to surrender
Jerusalem to the pope, they, realizing their power, refused to give it
up. Thus, the papacy created the Crusades to drive the Islamic forces
out of Jerusalem, and establish the throne of the pope in Jerusalem
“People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one, and if you repeat it frequently enough, people will sooner or later believe it.” ― Walter C. Langer
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
chemirocha wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Intelligentsia wrote:Air force's have over decades been simulating & even conducting aerial trainings & manoeuvres (sorties/ dogfights) using enemy aircraft to assess performance of the enemy's craft as well as their own against the same aircraft. Even using their paint schemes is fair game. 1) The Hornet here is the 'aggressor' fighter (simulates a 'bogey'/ 'bandit'- hostile and unidentified aircrafts), used for training purposes. 2) This appears a 2014 or so vid, not Syrian theatre, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QunNlF7-BUE
Or could be Uncle Sam is terrified (justifiably so) of the lethal, very formidable and very highly capable Russian S-400 missile SAM (can shoot any flying object - even one as small as a football travelling at supersonic speed). Oh, Intelligentsia, who needs to repaint planes for "training"? USAF? The greatest airforce in the world? YES, USAF. Click here These are not WW2 planes. They have all sorts of cutting edge electronics to identify friend and foe (IFF systems) which enables the super clever pilots to fight at night, in bad weather and even . . . . in zero visibility. Surely. trying to explain this away is comical. Remember the vial of white powder brandished in the UN Assembly that could be and was to be launched in 45 minutes ........ I know about use of IFF systems, its what identifies a 'friendly' from a 'bandit' far away even before the pilots have visual contact with each other - a key consideration before launching Beyond-Visual-Range missiles. Aggressor aircraft can and do carry paint schemes of enemy craft to simulate enemy 'bandit's. Do US soldiers wear Ruskies uniforms when doing drills with NATO partners when simulating the enemy bandits? Wacha hiyo story yako. It is not meant for adults. I will not be taken in by it, maybe someone else will have that wool pulled over their eyes but not me and I think many other war-weary world citizens too. Stop mixing issues here. For training exercises the US Airforce has been repainting jets in enemy colours since the days of the Cold War. There are so many photos over the years of US jets with Iranian, Arab and Soviet/ Russian colour schemes. Of course you see no correlation between that habit and the fact that they have been involved in numerous wars all over the world all the while touching the tusk of the elephant in the room and insisting it is just a spear. Suit yourself. 1. they have been outed in regards to this maneuver and public support for 'retaliation' in the face of 'provocations' will be reduced and politicians being politicians will pander to the whims of their electorate. 2. they have lost the initiative on the ground in Syria and now can only react 3. one option they can use to react is sanctions and threats of international criminal court of which you have been hearing a lot about, haven't you? 4. the other option is to be schizophrenic and allow more sophisticated weaponry into the hands of jihadists and those to whom the basic tenets of democracy like voting out a government is foreign which you have also been hearing a lot about. Whatever we discuss here the above 4 points stand.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
@Anti_Burglar, the education you've given the people here is invaluable. There were so many people here who were ignorant of these dirty businesses... Thank you for opening our eyes a bit wider.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
Kratos wrote:Do you agree with this statement from that book? Quote:A crusade? Crusades were Catholic holy wars fought during the Dark Ages against Moslem hordes who refused to relinquish Jerusalem to the pope. What does George Bush mean by a crusade? Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit priest, in his crusader series, has made it clear that the Vatican created Islam to destroy Christians and Jews, protect Roman Catholics, and to capture Jerusalem for the pope. For the first few hundred years of their existence, Islam did just that. When it came time for the powerful generals of the Islamic armies to surrender Jerusalem to the pope, they, realizing their power, refused to give it
up. Thus, the papacy created the Crusades to drive the Islamic forces out of Jerusalem, and establish the throne of the pope in Jerusalem @kratos, even just using a single cell in your medulla oblongata, you would simply ask why would the Catholics create a system that is adverse to the Catholic Church? This idea conceived by Alberto Rivera, anti-Catholic activist (born recently 1935–1997) is just a sensational and exciting novelty. Because, there is no single piece of primary evidence i.e. documentation to that regard other than anti-catholic novels. I've told you once and again that if you want to know the origin of Islam, look at the book. Islam is the Quran Koran. Without the Quran, there is no Islam.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|