This whole ASP issue was just a red herring to make some followers happy.

1. Rule 68 is not going to be repealed by anyone. However many prayer rallies people hold and include the pope.

So that being the lie that the Mpigs told that they were going to repeal rule 68 they had to get something.

Something that should have been left to the bureaucrats because it may make sense. May being the important word.

The issue of using the rule retroactively.

That is part of a case in the Appeals Court at the Hague. It is not illogical to think that Ruto (please note I did not say Kenya) has a chance at the Appeals court.

So why spend 100million just to make noise at the ASP?

The rule has not been repealed. It won't be. Plenary has not yet decided on any so called compromise as at 8:30 pm Kenyan time.

For that we lost face in the diplomatic world.

What may happen is that the wordings to do with retroactive may be changed. Again...that all depends on the mood of the judges.

So unless we are planning another 100 Mpigs attack at the Hague, Ruto is far, very far from having the prayers answered.

Itumbi and his hashtag army should just accept that they fell way short of what they went to do there.

Mambo bado sio mazuri until the Appeals Court rules. By that time Bensuda may be so annoyed she decides to add more charges or just keep Ruto at the Hague.

And there you go

We sent sijui who there to state the obvious. I said the only thing that they may get would be language. Nothing more. Ati repeal Article 68 who came up with that one?





Having said that, you have to wonder about the school of thought out there that this so much noise was not about Ruto but....

Because Ruto's case has little to do with Rule 68

This is his problem



These are the facts of the case. Not hii kupayuka ovyo.

For Ruto's case, I see nothing changing an iota. This court has been known to use very ambigous rules to jail people. Article 69 has already been quoted by one judge.

At the same time, the rumors that some people have pending warrants should be the reason to worry and stop public rallies.

Now will the judges go on ahead and use the rule retroactively...?I dont think so...Africa will have a legitimate reason to walk out ..this time for good. But this court met it's match Kwinya sio Congo{|= {|= {|=

Del

ASP reaffirms non retroactivity of rule 68. So now the story is changed to rule 69(3) being more lethal.

Poleni!