wazua Sat, Jun 20, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

19 Pages«<1213141516>»
Of Kusema na Kutender and Economy Melt Down
dunkang
#131 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 4:03:50 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/2/2011
Posts: 4,824
Location: -1.2107, 36.8831
Receive with simplicity everything that happens to you.” ― Rashi

Angelica _ann
#132 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 5:14:42 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/7/2012
Posts: 11,941
http://www.spectator.co....kenyans-here-in-africa/


How true that is I don't know..... Below the belts
In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
maka
#133 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 6:54:04 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
RAILA: ANOTHER LOAN AND ANOTHER SET OF QUESTIONS ON TOP OF EURO BOND MYSTERY:

The National Government has just announced that it has signed a Ksh61 billion syndicated loan to fund infrastructure projects. We are aware that this loan was signed on October 28, 2015. The announcement today has largely come because the government knew we have come to know about this new loan that has many questions begging for answers.

We have been aware that this loan is the sole reason President Uhuru Kenyatta, three days ago, was upbeat that the economy is in good shape and the Opposition and Kenyans are simply whining. In reality, we are staring at a classic case of digging a hole to fill a hole.

This new loan, like the Euro Bond loan, has many lose ends and many aspects that need to be explained. For instance, we are aware that certain percentages of this 600 million Sterling Pounds loan, ranging between 1.5 per cent, 1.2 per cent and 1 per cent have been earmarked as commission for those who negotiated this loan and other players the saga. Information we have is that in total, up to one quarter of this loan will go into commissions for the negotiators and brokers who remain mysterious but whose allocations are clearly spelt out in the loan agreement.

It also remains unclear why Kenya chose to go for loans with the Citi Bank and Standard Chartered Bank of the UK as opposed to other lenders like the African Development Bank whose terms are traditionally more favourable than those of the commercial banks.

This loan comes in the middle of many unanswered questions on Euro Bond. We therefor now demand that President Uhuru Kenyatta immediately reveals to Kenyans all details regarding this loan. This demand does not take away our demands for clarity and probity on Eurobond. The government must reveal to Kenyans:

1. The terms of contract of the 600 million Sterling Pounds loan just announced. The fact of the matter is that as things stand today; our economy is not in the best shape. Ideally if the markets fear there is a chance of default, they will demand higher interest rates to give return for greater risk. The impact of this will be a reduction of private sector spending thus a constricted economy. That creates a merry go round in which we try to solve a problem only to create another. We need clarity on the terms and conditions attached to this loan if only to assure Kenyans that we are not at the mercy of global finance shylocks keen to capitalize on our shaky situation.

2. The names of all the private institutions outside the Ministry of Finance and Attorney General's office and individuals that were contracted to work on this new loan scheme. They must be mentioned by name, contact address and their roles. These individuals and institutions are clearly allocated commissions out of this loan. We are entitled to know who they are and what they did for us.

3. An account of the processes and projects on which the loan is expected to finance and the current status of the projects.

We wish to make it abundantly clear that we do not in any way believe that as a country, we can develop without loans. But we stand opposed to what appears to be a reckless disregard of the interests of future generations of Kenyans, where the Government signs for loans shrouded in secrecy and lack of clarity, and the benefits of borrowing are consumed by the Jubilee government in the form of corruptly acquired wealth for a handful of powerful individuals while the burden to repay is placed on the children and grandchildren of millions of poor Kenyans.

We are entitled to answers. The government is obliged to give us those answers.

Under the Constitution of Kenya, the people have a right to all information held by the state regarding loans and the disbursement of the proceeds there from. Article 35 (1) (a) of the Constitution provides that:-

"Every citizen has the right to information held by the State."

Article 35 (3) provides:-

"The state shall publish and publicize any important information affecting the nation.”

The President must speak to Kenyans and lift the secrecy over these loans.

RT HON RAILA ODINGA; EGH

CORD COALITION/ ODM PARTY LEADER.

NOVEMBER 3, 2015.
possunt quia posse videntur
maka
#134 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 7:03:49 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
faa
#135 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 7:06:03 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/8/2007
Posts: 709
Waiguru ni manzi ya uhuru, hawezi guswa.

Uhuru says eti the economy is stable wapi..to him it doesnt matter,after all he can work to KCB and withdrawal 1billion.

limanika
#136 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:55:11 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/21/2011
Posts: 2,032
We must start asking ourselves what is the more lasting solution to this mega corruption? It appears every government/mp/cs coming to power must manufacture a scandal to pay expenses for the last election spend and the next.

People elected to high office aren’t afraid of mega stealing, since, it will be very difficult to prove they were responsible, and even if they are kicked out, they have stolen enough to squander for the rest of their lives, even if they will just be ever sitting on a rocking chair at home. So, you sack one, the next appointee behaves exactly the same way and the cycle continues.

I think it’s more of a system problem. The sad thing is that even though the powers that be can easily get solutions to these challenges, it is increasingly becoming clear they won’t do it since by so doing they wouldn’t be able to recover their campaign spends.

The threat to kick them out in the next election not good enough since in any case they have stolen enough to spend in rocking chairs for the rest of their lives.

The church and civil society has kept quiet, the donors of the 1990s are no longer able to help as they’re also facing challenges.
goldenberg
#137 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 9:30:37 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 11/14/2012
Posts: 10
the problem is a cultural problem deeply en-grained in everyone. It is no longer the case of a few bad apples.
limanika
#138 Posted : Tuesday, November 03, 2015 9:51:18 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/21/2011
Posts: 2,032
After Eurobond, the govt has borrowed an extra 61b, apparently to ‘finance infrastructure projects’.

Someone tell me, why would anyone need to ‘borrow’ money to finance an infrastructure project already ongoing? I thought funds are mobilised before onset of projects and set aside for that purpose? Why would you ever send a contractor to site if you didn’t have enough money to fund the project in the first place?

Someone please explain to me like a two year old.
hardwood
#139 Posted : Wednesday, November 04, 2015 11:13:02 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
Meanwhile as all the attention is shifted to waigoorooo, the eating frenzy continues.

dunkang
#140 Posted : Wednesday, November 04, 2015 11:24:37 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/2/2011
Posts: 4,824
Location: -1.2107, 36.8831
limanika wrote:
After Eurobond, the govt has borrowed an extra 61b, apparently to ‘finance infrastructure projects’.

Someone tell me, why would anyone need to ‘borrow’ money to finance an infrastructure project already ongoing? I thought funds are mobilised before onset of projects and set aside for that purpose? Why would you ever send a contractor to site if you didn’t have enough money to fund the project in the first place?

Someone please explain to me like a two year old.


I don't know how i will do it, but i hope you have gone to school;

1. A department of a Ministry formulates a Project or a programme (many projects in one)

2. Contractor is picked to execute the project at a cost A

3. Since the contractor had to win the job, he seriously underquoted (cutting others)

4. At the middle of the project, the Contractor approaches the Engineer and the Project/Programme Manager and explains to them, " Hii kazi siwezi maliza na hii pesa".

5. The Engineer and Project/Programme Manager come up with changes to the initial designs and specifications.

6. The Contractor raises a variation order i.e. work/specifications has changed, so, charges MUST also change. This VOs are like those 8K pens.

7. The GoK starts looking for additional money to cover the "extra work".

8. Contractor gives 10% of the contract amount to Engineer and Project/Programme Manager, who in turn takes care of their respective "friends" and bosses.

Thika Highway was initially KShs. 21B, but ended up using over KShs. 35B. 10% of 14B was KShs. 1.4B. TAFAKARI HAYO!

Like this guys here at the GDC Contract Rigs moving contract
Receive with simplicity everything that happens to you.” ― Rashi

19 Pages«<1213141516>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.