Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 14,216 Location: nairobi
|
VituVingiSana wrote:obiero wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:obiero wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:If not for my indirect holdings in KQ, this would not bother me. Unfortunately, unlike Uchumi, I have a much larger stake in KQ by virtue of 1/50,000,000th of Treasury's stake and a much larger stake or % in KQLC.
KQLC has not only got shares in KQ but a huge loan exposure. GoK is not great about paying on guarantees.
Whereas I wish KQ well, I hope it doesn't return to KQLC or GoK for another bailout.
GoK debt remains significant in KQ books. A second restructuring maybe? Incase KAA takeover fails, that will be their only option Unless KQ files for bankruptcy, as I think it should, another financial restructuring is likely. The much vaunted KQ-KAA tie-up is a mere band-aid. KQLC members need to get realistic and provide for the non-guaranteed portions of the loans as well as 100% of the shares. KQLC can still look in on KQ as well as remain on the board. I do that with ARM. I follow the happenings on ARM but it is fully provided for. Realism. Prudence. The only Prudence name I know about is Bushnell.. We are turning this thing around with or without JKIA. Remember KQ is a turnaround stock meant only for persons who can afford to forfeit their investment  The Taxpayer can't afford to lose any more money in KQ. I already told you that I spoke to the president.. Await Pkosing report KQ ABP 4.26
|