wazua Tue, Apr 7, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

66 Pages«<1011121314>»
KQ in 2010-11 (Boom, Bust or Blah)
VituVingiSana
#111 Posted : Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:27:20 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,362
Location: Nairobi
@rahatupu - I acknowledge that...

BTW, Kotoka has/had air-conditioned buses for years to take you from the plane to the terminal... When I hit JKIA... I have to tarmack it!

What I am saying is for KQ to be a REGIONAL CARRIER using Nairobi as a HUB... we need to look at Dubai or Singapore not these small airports!

JKIA was built to accomodate 2.5mn pax... KQ flies 2.5mn pax!

Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Ric dees
#112 Posted : Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:54:02 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 632
@VVS
I may be mistaken but i clearly remember being ferried across the Apron (it's not a tarmac boss) upon arriving on KQ in 2008 in air conditioned buses (very similar to the ones in DXB).

That said, Singapore is a dream too far at the moment, i think the airport in Capetown is functional and this can work for us, i think this comparisons will get us nowhere, In my limited knowledge of Aviation, expansion of JKIA will first warrant an extra runway,(Pesa Hakuna) and this will not be even 30% utilized that said the two ground handling companies (Swissport & Kenya Aerotech)do not have the capacity to to take on new carriers, they will need serious overhaul in their equipment to do this.

The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday's logic.
VituVingiSana
#113 Posted : Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:10:10 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,362
Location: Nairobi
Ric dees wrote:
@VVS
I may be mistaken but i clearly remember being ferried across the Apron (it's not a tarmac boss) upon arriving on KQ in 2008 in air conditioned buses (very similar to the ones in DXB)

Not me... I had to walk to the plane from the Terminal/Gate to the plane & same back... Maybe they do so (buses) for planes parked further out... I have NEVER been in a KQ bus!

BTW, did you know KQ had to buy their own buses! The corrupt a-holes at JKIA/KAA are supposed to provide the buses!

LOL... Chief... the Apron is Tarmac/Asphalt with a fancier name!
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#114 Posted : Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:12:32 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,362
Location: Nairobi
Ric dees wrote:
expansion of JKIA will first warrant an extra runway,(Pesa Hakuna) and this will not be even 30% utilized that said the two ground handling companies (Swissport & Kenya Aerotech)do not have the capacity to to take on new carriers, they will need serious overhaul in their equipment to do this.
KQ has been crying for a 2nd Runway for 3 years. It is needed. IF there is an accident on the existing Runway, the airport shuts down!!!

As for Ground Handling firms, they will get more equipment as needed... BTW, KQ Cargo is the largest in East Africa.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
VituVingiSana
#115 Posted : Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:23:54 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,362
Location: Nairobi
Africa Then Versus Now, In the Eyes of a Pan Am Vet (Guest Post)

Posted: 09 Sep 2010 03:45 AM PDT

Cranky is on a much-needed vacation and won’t be responding to emails this week. Fortunately, before I started drinking too heavily, I put some posts live. Today, we’ve got a guest post from a guy who helped open up Africa for Pan Am and is now doing the same for Delta.

People often ask me what has changed in Africa over the last 25 years to make it possible for Delta Air Lines to fly to a continent that my former employer, Pan Am, largely abandoned in the 1980s. How could it be financially prudent for a major airline to invest large aircraft and resources in a continent with a gross domestic product equal to a fraction of U.S. GDP, they ask?
Vastly improved technology, stronger, consolidated global airlines and accelerating economic growth across Africa are the simple answers.

When I began my aviation career with Pan Am in Johannesburg in 1973, Africa was still a wild frontier for Western-style commerce. Phone lines were unsecure and unreliable. Computer systems were not connected. And airport infrastructure was generally not available unless you bought it or built it yourself.
To illustrate this point, Pan Am owned Intercontinental Hotels and constructed new properties around the globe to provide appropriate crew and passenger accommodations in many of the new cities it served.
And even after 30 years of air service development, in the 1970s many flights arrived from points across Africa with little advance notice of how many passengers were on board or how many customers would be making connections. Reliable data services simply were not available between the opposite coasts of Africa in those days.
Today, many of the age-old African political and infrastructure challenges remain. But new technology, improved communications and intra-Africa geopolitical improvements are making it possible for air travel to advance the pace for expanding global commerce on the continent.
As an example, this month Delta is returning to Monrovia, marking the first time U.S. airline service has existed in this market since the mid-1980s. When Pan Am served Liberia in the ’70s, we had to physically drive between the airport at Robertsfield and our commercial office in Monrovia to transfer information because we had no reliable way to communicate between the city and the airport.
Now, it is possible to use a Blackberry to stay connected to the world as we zig zag across Liberia or any country in Africa developing service. Improved intra-Africa airline service by the likes of Kenya Airways also make it possible to do business in many parts of the continent without making circuitous flight connections back through Europe as we had to do in the early days.
Advances in aircraft also have made Africa a more attractive theater for global aviation. When I started with Pan Am we never imagined the possibility of a Boeing 777-200LR aircraft flying nonstop in both directions between Atlanta and Johannesburg. And, in 1941, my predecessors certainly couldn’t have imagined these types of advances when they launched Pan Am’s first scheduled commercial service from New York to Senegal with intermediate stops in Bermuda, the Azores and Lisbon. Operated with Boeing 314 Flying Boat aircraft, the total travel time on this route exceeded 60 hours. Yes, 60 hours.

Today, Delta operates the same New York-to-Dakar route nonstop using Boeing 757 jets with a flight time of just over eight hours – not the three days required for the original Pan Am flight.
Pan Am served more than a dozen cities in Africa at its height, but the trail blazed to reach that point took more than three decades. In three years, Delta has grown to serve seven destinations in Africa with plans to grow to at least 10 once additional government approvals are received.
As our example shows, airlines that reach the market first, make lasting investments in infrastructure, customer service and pan-regional partnerships will create the most value for their customers and, most importantly, the African nations that so badly want to boost their economic outputs.
Growing relationships with carriers like Air Nigeria and Kenya Airways are indicators of the investments we must make beyond the airfields we serve. And the relationships the industry is building with governments across the continent mark a critical step in advancing the growth of Africa’s own aviation infrastructure in the years to come.
While I won’t be here to see the next 40 years in Africa, I’m sure they will be even more exciting than the last. There are very few places left on the globe with such promise of development as Africa. And this bodes well for airline managers everywhere.

Jimmy Eichelgruen is Delta’s regional sales manager for Africa. He is based in London but spends most of his time on planes flying to and from points across Africa. He began his aviation career in 1969 with South African Airways and in 1973 joined Pan American Airways as a sales representative advancing to Director of Sales – Africa with assignments in Johannesburg, Nairobi, Monrovia and Abidijan. He became part of Delta’s London office when the airline acquired Pan Am’s trans-Atlantic routes in 1991.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Ric dees
#116 Posted : Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:36:08 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 632
@VVS..Apron fancier name Laughing out loudly..
Anyways i know KQ has been crying for a second run-way and i too think we need it like yesterday but i find it rather naive on their part to demand it knowing all too well what it entails.I think it's more the issue of "ball in your court" run with it.If you read ICAO conditions KAA needs to develop and sustain the Aviation safety oversight capability, this means investing in new modern communication navigation and surveillance equipment (Not cheap by any standard).

I personally think we stand a better chance of upgrading Wilson so as to handle the regional flights esp in the night when the airport is closed.

The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday's logic.
VituVingiSana
#117 Posted : Friday, September 10, 2010 7:35:41 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,362
Location: Nairobi
Ric dees wrote:
@VVS..Apron fancier name Laughing out loudly..
Anyways i know KQ has been crying for a second run-way and i too think we need it like yesterday but i find it rather naive on their part to demand it knowing all too well what it entails.I think it's more the issue of "ball in your court" run with it.If you read ICAO conditions KAA needs to develop and sustain the Aviation safety oversight capability, this means investing in new modern communication navigation and surveillance equipment (Not cheap by any standard).

I personally think we stand a better chance of upgrading Wilson so as to handle the regional flights esp in the night when the airport is closed.

Nonsense! KQ has asked for an expanded JKIA for years! I was at an AGM in 2003 when KQ told shareholders that the airport will be too small for them in 4 years! Basically, KQ plans were to hit 2.5mn pax by 2007-8...

Rwanda is going to BUILD a new airport in 4 years max! The corrupt idiots at KAA/JKIA can't build a 2nd Runway???

Heck, if you let the Chinese do it... we will have a brand new runway + terminal in 2 years!

BTW, Wilson Airport has issues with the flight path... + it is too small to handle many regional jets like the 737s favored by KQ
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Gordon Gekko
#118 Posted : Friday, September 10, 2010 11:22:16 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/27/2008
Posts: 3,760
KQ can use Embraer (they are STOL) at Wilson, only problem is that these Embraers feed the 767/777s going to other destinations. That would make passengers shuttling between Wilson and JKIA a nightmare.

BTW, for as long as I remember, the JKIA maps have always included the second runway - it runs from near Syokimau and cuts the present runway near the end. As we talk, land is being grabbed and we will end up with a Wilson scenario.

VituVingiSana
#119 Posted : Friday, September 10, 2010 11:29:50 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,362
Location: Nairobi
@GG - On my recent flight into JKIA from the south approach, I saw houses/farms/buildings that seemed fairly new... Anyway, I can't be certain if they were new but the buffer between the residential areas & JKIA is diminishing fast!

At best, Wilson can only be used for domestic flights that do NOT require connections to international destinations...
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
Ric dees
#120 Posted : Friday, September 10, 2010 1:00:14 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/6/2008
Posts: 632
@VVS...much as i agree about "encroachment" of the flight path at Wilson Airport, however i believe this is small fry and a problem that can easily be overcome if Hong Kong airport is anything to go by. This believe me is a scary place to land with all the mountains and skyscrapers around the airport and the runway heads towards the Victoria harbor no mean feat for a 777-200 leave alone the 737-800 Kq uses for regional flying.

Quite frankly i strongly believe upgrading Wilson airport is a step in the right direction all factors considered.

The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence; it is to act with yesterday's logic.
66 Pages«<1011121314>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.