alma1 wrote:masukuma wrote:alma1 wrote:Washiku I have not said IEBC should go. I have been very clear that some people were implicated in a court case that was heard, determined and concluded to have been recipients of some bribes.
how many times must I say that
THIS HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED!! You can say what you wish to say.
Fact is that there are people in jail right now for what you are claiming has not been determined. That's ok too.
I thought you were more empirical that this! people are in jail for giving money to a guy who claimed to be ferrying messages from the person you want to lynch <----
why is this difficult to wrap your brain around? I go to Washiks and claim that Alma wants cash. Washiks gives me Cash. Those are the only facts on the table! at least during the court proceedings that took place in! the SFO just needed to prove that I asked Washiks to do something illegal and Washiks did it! Washiks is in jail now coz of that illegality... Should Alma be in jail as well? No! Should Alma be investigated? YES!! Investigated not lynched! <---
why is that so hard to wrap your head around? P.S. the Commissioners don't even make decisions related to procurement! The chief procurement officer is the CEO! It may seem like this scene in Schindler's list
To conveniently blame the dead guy (the guy who already is fired/suspended/out). But in this case - it's true!
The scene in Schindler's list is conveniently named "Who's Stolen The Chicken?" , you just have to love the irony
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!