wazua Tue, Jun 23, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

16 Pages«<1011121314>»
Security Laws Amendment Bill
Options
Previous Topic · Next Topic
symbols
#111 Posted : Tuesday, December 23, 2014 7:38:24 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/19/2013
Posts: 2,552
Back to top
  |
washiku
#112 Posted : Tuesday, December 23, 2014 7:42:04 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 5/9/2007
Posts: 13,095
Back to top
  |
Lolest!
#113 Posted : Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:10:36 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
I'm still perplexed at the speed with which stuff happened last week. from the acrimony in the house to the speedy signing.

I wanted to condemn CORD for doing this, but a fainter version of this was enacted in 1997. I later watched and supported. The DN shouted 'Pandemonium' on page 1. I rememmber DP's Mulusya of Kangundo waving a placard as the budget was read. He was in the shouting chorus of NO REFORMS, NO BUDGET

Icharia of Kiambaa grabbed the mace. He was named.

I do not know what to make of this yet. I think upinzani have scored an impressive A for enlightening the masses about the bill but get a D for method of attempting to block in the house

If we applaud them, it might happen that everytime the minority is unhappy they will follow CORD's plan. On the other hand, it's their duty as the upinzani to block such.

I support the court action though
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
Back to top
  |
Lolest!
#114 Posted : Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:16:09 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
washiku wrote:
AlphDoti wrote:
poundfoolish wrote:
I say bring that bill. Enact it..

It is being supported here because people feel one of us is in government and we are good with it. but we have been here before. Somebody else will take over from 'our own' and it shall be back to Moi era.

We have such warthog brains...

@poundfoolish you're right. We're one bunch of sorry state citizens. The 2002 euphoria was not about M01 after all. It was about taking power back to the Mt.
It was not really about a good constitution.
OK, wait until the crying man takes power. Then we will hear about constitution review again!!

Power Corrupts Absolutely.


So how are you different from those purportedly "supporting" them? Why must everything always be "them" against "us"? When will we ever be on the side of Kenya?

Alphdoti's hatred for MT people is evident in wazua. His problem is the USA and MT people!
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
Back to top
  |
Lolest!
#115 Posted : Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:22:53 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
nakujua wrote:
AlphDoti wrote:
alma wrote:
murchr wrote:
Is one paper enough to justify your assertions? Are those dead people? More importantly are they British?

I thought yesterday your people said international newspapers don't post dead bodies and terror victims.

Murchr, please don't spread another lie. Do you want more links from other media?

I'm just being nice here. There are pictures of dead children inside their coffins. Just ask REUTERS to give you a sample.

This reminds me of the other law guys wanted to come up with based on the lie that Americans don't use cash in buses.

Don't create a law based on lying to citizens. That is already an example of having ulterior motives.

Tell them @alma. I get sick when I see people supposed to be learned stop using their brains. They just spew what they hear from Maina in the morning, or what their pastors comment, or what they read on the newspapers.

You know, that's why congratulate the Atheist sometimes! Because they use their brains!

NOTE: I didn't say I support the atheist. I said I congratulate them because they have been thinking!

chuki itakumaliza - Sad

kabisaa! if there's one guy who'll die of chuki, it's this one
Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
Back to top
  |
tycho
#116 Posted : Wednesday, December 24, 2014 6:11:13 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Uram wrote:
washiku wrote:
By the way CORD walienda kortini?



http://mobile.nation.co.ke/news/Case-over-new-law-to-be-filed-in-court-Tuesday/-/1950946/2566258/-/format/xhtml/-/34wd98/-/index.html


Where cord is more likely to lose than win.
Back to top
  |
maka
#117 Posted : Wednesday, December 24, 2014 3:55:36 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
tycho wrote:
Uram wrote:
washiku wrote:
By the way CORD walienda kortini?



http://mobile.nation.co.ke/news/Case-over-new-law-to-be-filed-in-court-Tuesday/-/1950946/2566258/-/format/xhtml/-/34wd98/-/index.html


Where cord is more likely to lose than win.


Straight win...

The matter will proceed to its full course after Lenaola declines to suspend the laws temporarily...
possunt quia posse videntur
Back to top
  | | Edit by user: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 4:25 PM | Reason: Not specified
maka
#118 Posted : Wednesday, December 24, 2014 3:59:39 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 4/22/2010
Posts: 11,522
Location: Nairobi
Look at this....
Section 30F(2)
"A person who publishes or broadcasts photographs of victims of a terrorist attack without the consent of the National Police Service and of the victim commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or to a fine not exceeding five million shillings or both."
possunt quia posse videntur
Back to top
  |
Ngong
#119 Posted : Wednesday, December 24, 2014 6:37:05 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 11/17/2012
Posts: 1,461
Location: Ngong Forest
symbols wrote:
Top cop to be first ‘casualty’ of new security law


Funny isn't it? new CS same same policemen! l wish him the best
Back to top
  |
limanika
#120 Posted : Thursday, December 25, 2014 4:46:32 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/21/2011
Posts: 2,032
maka wrote:
Look at this....
Section 30F(2)
"A person who publishes or broadcasts photographs of victims of a terrorist attack without the consent of the National Police Service and of the victim commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or to a fine not exceeding five million shillings or both."

Where is the problem? If any, the court should advice cord to refine the new law through Parliament, since the law is not unconstitutional
Back to top
  |
16 Pages«<1011121314>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Wazua Club SK Theme
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.