I don't see the big deal with the lawyers in this case, this seems to be common arguments based on written down rules governing the whole process of the presidential election. Considering what the guys are paid I was expecting a different level of preparedness.

e.g show how sample ballot boxes are sealed using visual aids, show using scientific methods how long it would take to bring ballots from wherever they are to the sc ...

this is one of the biggest case in the country and lawyers can't even get the timing right, very amateurish.

Dear @radio,

The link posted yesterday here #147 was quite in order. But @harrydre reposted the link today for comment; sure enough an analysis began with @masukuma giving a long personal assessment. Left unchecked, it naturally was inviting defense from their opponents which would naturally lead to mud slinging ('stole','rigged','false evidence','throw out petition' etc.)

It's exactly for this reason we frown on expert personal opinions in support of a political party's position. Members must control this burning itch to beat their CORD/TNA drums in their neighbour's house.



The Wazua spirit