Wazua
»
Groups
»
Triumph
»
Cytonn Investments
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/23/2009 Posts: 8,083 Location: Enk are Nyirobi
|
There are only 4 absolute rights under our Constitution that cannot be limited. Free speech isn't one of them (See Articles 24 & 25 of the Constitution).[quote=paulkimani]People are being SUED by CYTONN for writing on social media that they have not been paid. Investors have not been paid and yet a company is trying to silence them.
Our constitution allows for free speech. Cytonn is trying to stop an investor having the right to freedom of speech. Let that sink in. Cytonn is using a baseless legal tactic to try stall attention away from The Fact they have not paid clients. This suit will not hold in a court of law. Life is short. Live passionately.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/10/2015 Posts: 961 Location: Kenya
|
Wazoo Investment Club Rules 1 - The status of All companies must be evaluated and discussed thoroughly to enable members make the right investment decisions EXCEPT for CyTony where only positive comments about the company SHALL be allowed. 2. Anyone who fails to comply with Rule No.1 and writes, says or thinks anything negative about the exempted company mentioned in Rule No. 1 will be guilty of an offense and SHALL be reported to the company CEO who will deal with him cacophonously including suing the offender to his last coin and sending him to Kamiti. 3. Refer to Rule No.1 Proverbs 13:11 Dishonest money dwindles away, but whoever gathers money little by little makes it grow.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/2/2009 Posts: 2,458 Location: Nairobi
|
paulkimani wrote:
Cytonn’s in-house lawyer, Patricia Wanjama – as well as being enjoined in the Britam suit – is being investigated by the LSK disciplinary committee. Her own father sits on the board of the LSK disciplinary committee, and Cytonn also now sponsors the LSK - as stated on the LSK website.
Many companies and individuals are creating real estate deals much larger than Cytonn – which begs the question – why is the media focusing on Cytonn (see BD article on Cytonn “Causing a storm” in the real estate market) – Are they “sponsoring” the media also?
I understand Horton did not approve of this comment on a previous thread as I am a “Hello”, however these are indeed important questions to ask before investing your money with anyone. Yes, I am new to this – I am also aware that if you invest, you must do so having conducted the necessary due diligence to ensure your investment is in safe and clean hands.
I’d be interested to read other people’s opinions on this forum.
You joined on 19th January 2016 and that there, what I have quoted, on 21st January 2016 was your first post. You have kept the thread going for 5 years. 56 pages later and 1,072 posts on how the company is going down. I have to give it to you on consistency. May your next paymaster be as generous and persistent
|
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 1/3/2007 Posts: 18,349 Location: Nairobi
|
sqft wrote:Wazoo Investment Club Rules
1 - The status of All companies must be evaluated and discussed thoroughly to enable members make the right investment decisions EXCEPT for CyTony where only positive comments about the company SHALL be allowed.
2. Anyone who fails to comply with Rule No.1 and writes, says or thinks anything negative about the exempted company mentioned in Rule No. 1 will be guilty of an offense and SHALL be reported to the company CEO who will deal with him cacophonously including suing the offender to his last coin and sending him to Kamiti.
3. Refer to Rule No.1  Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
|
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 1/3/2007 Posts: 18,349 Location: Nairobi
|
poundfoolish wrote:paulkimani wrote:
Cytonn’s in-house lawyer, Patricia Wanjama – as well as being enjoined in the Britam suit – is being investigated by the LSK disciplinary committee. Her own father sits on the board of the LSK disciplinary committee, and Cytonn also now sponsors the LSK - as stated on the LSK website.
Many companies and individuals are creating real estate deals much larger than Cytonn – which begs the question – why is the media focusing on Cytonn (see BD article on Cytonn “Causing a storm” in the real estate market) – Are they “sponsoring” the media also?
I understand Horton did not approve of this comment on a previous thread as I am a “Hello”, however these are indeed important questions to ask before investing your money with anyone. Yes, I am new to this – I am also aware that if you invest, you must do so having conducted the necessary due diligence to ensure your investment is in safe and clean hands.
I’d be interested to read other people’s opinions on this forum.
You joined on 19th January 2016 and that there, what I have quoted, on 21st January 2016 was your first post. You have kept the thread going for 5 years. 56 pages later and 1,072 posts on how the company is going down. I have to give it to you on consistency. May your next paymaster be as generous and persistent Lots of respect for @paulkimani. Reminds me of KQ, after 2012, and the constant abuse anyone who said anything that wasn't praising KQ took... Perhaps some of us may have thought of investing in Cytonn but lucked out thanks to PK Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/8/2008 Posts: 947
|
Say what you want about Cytonn. Sio ya mama yangu. I have disclosed several times I am an investor in Cytonn. Hizi rules are fake. I hope you are not Paul Kimani's real account  There was a guy here called cindano aka real massey who killed Kularaha Eskay company with several aliases. I would join the company meeting as different aliases. I hope this is not what is happening here. @Paul Kimani ... sio wewe ulikuwa unasema people in cytonn had white powder on their noses when you met them?? Sio wewe? Boss carry your own cross. sqft wrote:Wazoo Investment Club Rules
1 - The status of All companies must be evaluated and discussed thoroughly to enable members make the right investment decisions EXCEPT for CyTony where only positive comments about the company SHALL be allowed.
2. Anyone who fails to comply with Rule No.1 and writes, says or thinks anything negative about the exempted company mentioned in Rule No. 1 will be guilty of an offense and SHALL be reported to the company CEO who will deal with him cacophonously including suing the offender to his last coin and sending him to Kamiti.
3. Refer to Rule No.1
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/21/2018 Posts: 564 Location: Britain
|
VituVingiSana wrote:poundfoolish wrote:paulkimani wrote:
Cytonn’s in-house lawyer, Patricia Wanjama – as well as being enjoined in the Britam suit – is being investigated by the LSK disciplinary committee. Her own father sits on the board of the LSK disciplinary committee, and Cytonn also now sponsors the LSK - as stated on the LSK website.
Many companies and individuals are creating real estate deals much larger than Cytonn – which begs the question – why is the media focusing on Cytonn (see BD article on Cytonn “Causing a storm” in the real estate market) – Are they “sponsoring” the media also?
I understand Horton did not approve of this comment on a previous thread as I am a “Hello”, however these are indeed important questions to ask before investing your money with anyone. Yes, I am new to this – I am also aware that if you invest, you must do so having conducted the necessary due diligence to ensure your investment is in safe and clean hands.
I’d be interested to read other people’s opinions on this forum.
You joined on 19th January 2016 and that there, what I have quoted, on 21st January 2016 was your first post. You have kept the thread going for 5 years. 56 pages later and 1,072 posts on how the company is going down. I have to give it to you on consistency. May your next paymaster be as generous and persistent Lots of respect for @paulkimani. Reminds me of KQ, after 2012, and the constant abuse anyone who said anything that wasn't praising KQ took... Perhaps some of us may have thought of investing in Cytonn but lucked out thanks to PK I don't think there is any sane person who has invested with Cytonn after going through this thread. 0f course there are those who had invested with Cytonn much earlier during the formative stages.They were lured by the unsustainable interest rates quoted. These are the only innocent investors one can really feel for.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/21/2018 Posts: 564 Location: Britain
|
sqft wrote:Wazoo Investment Club Rules
1 - The status of All companies must be evaluated and discussed thoroughly to enable members make the right investment decisions EXCEPT for CyTony where only positive comments about the company SHALL be allowed.
2. Anyone who fails to comply with Rule No.1 and writes, says or thinks anything negative about the exempted company mentioned in Rule No. 1 will be guilty of an offense and SHALL be reported to the company CEO who will deal with him cacophonously including suing the offender to his last coin and sending him to Kamiti.
3. Refer to Rule No.1 You have nailed it.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/8/2008 Posts: 947
|
Queen Paul Kimani to the rescue!!!! This comedy is too much. Now the bloggers are on the run and cytonn is winning?? Stay tuned to queen kimani and the cytonn tales! Queen wrote:sqft wrote:Wazoo Investment Club Rules
1 - The status of All companies must be evaluated and discussed thoroughly to enable members make the right investment decisions EXCEPT for CyTony where only positive comments about the company SHALL be allowed.
2. Anyone who fails to comply with Rule No.1 and writes, says or thinks anything negative about the exempted company mentioned in Rule No. 1 will be guilty of an offense and SHALL be reported to the company CEO who will deal with him cacophonously including suing the offender to his last coin and sending him to Kamiti.
3. Refer to Rule No.1 You have nailed it.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/2/2009 Posts: 2,458 Location: Nairobi
|
VituVingiSana wrote:poundfoolish wrote:paulkimani wrote:
Cytonn’s in-house lawyer, Patricia Wanjama – as well as being enjoined in the Britam suit – is being investigated by the LSK disciplinary committee. Her own father sits on the board of the LSK disciplinary committee, and Cytonn also now sponsors the LSK - as stated on the LSK website.
Many companies and individuals are creating real estate deals much larger than Cytonn – which begs the question – why is the media focusing on Cytonn (see BD article on Cytonn “Causing a storm” in the real estate market) – Are they “sponsoring” the media also?
I understand Horton did not approve of this comment on a previous thread as I am a “Hello”, however these are indeed important questions to ask before investing your money with anyone. Yes, I am new to this – I am also aware that if you invest, you must do so having conducted the necessary due diligence to ensure your investment is in safe and clean hands.
I’d be interested to read other people’s opinions on this forum.
You joined on 19th January 2016 and that there, what I have quoted, on 21st January 2016 was your first post. You have kept the thread going for 5 years. 56 pages later and 1,072 posts on how the company is going down. I have to give it to you on consistency. May your next paymaster be as generous and persistent Lots of respect for @paulkimani. Reminds me of KQ, after 2012, and the constant abuse anyone who said anything that wasn't praising KQ took... Perhaps some of us may have thought of investing in Cytonn but lucked out thanks to PK To each his own..
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Groups
»
Triumph
»
Cytonn Investments
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|