I hope EACC have done their homework and have watertight cases with strong relevant evidence that can withstand scrutiny in a court of law. It will be very embarrassing if they did a shoddy job that will result in no cases or defeat in court.

The report is just a summary of allegations and investigations and not the findings with evidence

Then I think it was ill advised to make it public and ask the people to step aside for 60 days. Now EACC has 60 days to come up with strong evidence against 170 individuals. This is an overwhelming task that I doubt EACC is prepared for. Investigations are best done kichinichini, you do not call someone to attention and then inform them that you are investigating them. They now have the time and if indeed they are corrupt have the resources to frustrate the investigation.

These big cases can only be won if the evidence is watertight and that can only come if people are willing to sell each other. If the secretaries and other small insiders are offered incentives to spill the beans cases can be built very easily. Can you imagine if it was in law that if proven all graft proceeds would be seized by the state and then Tobiko offered 10% of the alleged graft amount to those willing to give information leading to its recovery. So kama unajua Rutto amekula 400 million, show us the evidence, he goes to jail, we recover it, you get 40 million hakuna maswali.

Fighting corruption is hard, not easy my brother

Evidence under analysis for Alfie!These vehicles were procured in 2013 and EACC is still analyzing evidence?UK should have started by asking everyone at EACC, DPP and Judiciary to step aside for investigations!


I think we are asking too much from those accused to step aside based on allegations.Anyone can make malicious allegationsvon you if they do not like you

Langata primary grabbing is not the singhs but Patrick who is a friend to the wailer