My 2 cents wrote:In the decision to have a child, I think the interests of the baby should precede those of the mother.
I agree.
There's something I found disqueting about her having Joshua because she put her interests first, (like in this case)and not the baby's.
We are happy and glad for her and esp. the baby that its -ve

and twas a safe delivery, but would our applause have been similarly loud if the kid was born +ve and remained so - condemned to a lifetime of drugs for the rest of its life - merely coz its mother wanted to have it while she could have exercised her maternal instinct differently by adopting?
She sends mixed signals to PLWAs.