wazua Fri, May 1, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

2 Pages12>
Libya under terrorist attack!
Insurgent
#1 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:45:42 PM
Rank: User

Joined: 8/6/2010
Posts: 594
Watching Thambo beki on whitesands bench K24 with Jeff, I was left with sour test in my mouth. It is now obvious Nato, read US, is the terrorist harassing Libya. Libya did not threaten any of the Nato countries for them to attack Libya. The Nato pigs need to be taught a lesson that they have no more right to life as the Libyans and by extension any African or oil producing country. Thambo stated that US created the Somalia situation. They want to create a similar upheaval in Libya which will disturbilize the rest of Africa. However, there are some naive Africans who still think Nato is doing the right thing. Anyone one in touch with Al Shabaab contacts can put them up here. I can donate at least 100,000 towards their cause.
"One man gives freely, yet gains even more; another withholds unduly, but comes to poverty. A generous man will prosper; he who refreshes others will himself be refreshed." Rev Canon Karanja.
2012
#2 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:22:37 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
Insurgent wrote:
Anyone one in touch with Al Shabaab contacts can put them up here. I can donate at least 100,000 towards their cause.
Uliza yule Minister ama MP. Anyway one man's terrorist is another man freedom fighter.
BBI will solve it :)
simonkabz
#3 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:23:34 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/2/2007
Posts: 8,776
Location: Cameroon
That includes some wazua 'self righteous' dim****.
TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
sky5
#4 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:30:22 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/7/2010
Posts: 282
Location: Nairobi
[quote=Insurgent]... It is now obvious Nato, read US, is the terrorist harassing Libya. Libya did not threaten any of the Nato countries for them to attack Libya. quote] You are right.The Nato 'intervention' was to kick Gaddafi out and any other 'despot' in the region.
MaichBlack
#5 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:37:07 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 7,910
China needs to flex some military muscle. Russia should also regain it military might. Watu waogopane. When Russia was Russia, it was "mguze uone". If you are pro-Russia and the US starts their monkey business, then it's on! We can't have one superpower acting like the headmaster of the world! Hata mimi hiyo nimekataa!!!
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
Kenyan Kop
#6 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:50:03 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 6/4/2007
Posts: 56
There is more to Libya than meets the eye. If you are really interested please read this opinion piece by Jean-Paul Pougala. You may see beyond the western propaganda. http://allafrica.com/stories/201104150792.html enjoy good people and have a wonderful evening.
simonkabz
#7 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:32:24 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/2/2007
Posts: 8,776
Location: Cameroon
@kenyan kop, every african should read that.
TULIA.........UFUNZWE!
Drunkard
#8 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:30:07 PM
Rank: User

Joined: 5/3/2011
Posts: 559
MaichBlack wrote:
China needs to flex some military muscle. Russia should also regain it military might. Watu waogopane. When Russia was Russia, it was "mguze uone". If you are pro-Russia and the US starts their monkey business, then it's on! We can't have one superpower acting like the headmaster of the world! Hata mimi hiyo nimekataa!!!
Unfortunately, neither China or Russia have any muscle to flex, US already have threaten to attack China if they touch Taiwan and what did China do? Russia cannot even control the former soviet UNION, Unless they cut the gas during winters....
MaichBlack
#9 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:39:06 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 7,910
Drunkard wrote:
MaichBlack wrote:
China needs to flex some military muscle. Russia should also regain it military might. Watu waogopane. When Russia was Russia, it was "mguze uone". If you are pro-Russia and the US starts their monkey business, then it's on! We can't have one superpower acting like the headmaster of the world! Hata mimi hiyo nimekataa!!!
Unfortunately, neither China or Russia have any muscle to flex, US already have threaten to attack China if they touch Taiwan and what did China do? Russia cannot even control the former soviet UNION, Unless they cut the gas during winters....
The US would never dare attack China!!! China has the capacity to rival the US in terms of military might if they put their mind to it [assuming they haven't!]. All they have to do is invest in manpower, researcher, counter intelligence, military hardware [research and development] etc.
Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good returns.
Drunkard
#10 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:44:52 PM
Rank: User

Joined: 5/3/2011
Posts: 559
Kenyan Kop wrote:
There is more to Libya than meets the eye. If you are really interested please read this opinion piece by Jean-Paul Pougala. You may see beyond the western propaganda. http://allafrica.com/stories/201104150792.html enjoy good people and have a wonderful evening.
This is a propaganda by itself, let us not pretend like we don't know that Lybian people went to the streets demanding fair treatment and the opportunity to chose their future and they were met by gun fires and murder from the regime, do you think Gadafi is the only good leader in Lybia? Think again, these powerful leaders wrote all this to confuse you and I; now you're confuse to the extend that you've forgotten why NATO came to Lybia in the first place!
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.