muganda wrote:@slykat, interesting points.
If it goes wrong with the lawyer, what then?
If its by the lawyer's incompetence, negligence or fraud, then you have recourse to the LSK Disciplinary committee and an action in court or police if it be criminal. If the fault lies elsewhere, your lawyer should rectify or if unable advise on course of action.
muganda wrote:If the lawyer doesn't sit on the money, does it render him incapable of seeing the conveyancing to its conclusive end?
Not ipso facto.
muganda wrote:And why does this lawyer frown upon a proxy like an escrow or bank undertaking? Is it because he's dealing with an individual?
My understanding is that it is the seller frowning not the lawyer.
muganda wrote:Too many questions with one lawyer, yet there are many good lawyers in practice.
That lawyer is not a bad one on the basis of the info we have only; chances are, he just wants to exercise full professional responsibility... not taking full legal responsibility and liability for work not done by him.
NB: We do not know the nature of the instructions given to the lawyer in full... so only, Kwanini may be following what am saying as he does.